ReviewFuture oncology (London, England)2024
Patients' and clinicians' knowledge in cancer-related cognitive impairment and its implications: current perspective.
Review in Future oncology (London, England), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Pre-treatment cognitive impairment in patients with NSCLC: Prevalence and psychosocial factors.IBRO neuroscience reports · 2026Article
- Efficacy of walking or exercise for improving perceived cognitive function in adults during and after cancer therapy: a systematic review and network analysis.Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2026Review
- Cognitive speed-accuracy dissociation in multiple myeloma: a cross‑sectional study.BMC neuroscience · 2026Article
- Efficacy of Technology-Based Cognitive Rehabilitation Tools for Cancer-Related Cognitive Impairment in Non-CNS Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Cognitive complaints in patients after cancer treatment: understanding oncologists' representations and management practices.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Health literacy is essential in cancer care. Low health literacy compromises the capacity to maintain one's health through self-management and collaboration with healthcare providers, especially when facing cognitive side effects related to cancer and its treatments. Cancer-related cognitive impairment (CRCI) is a common phenomenon among cancer patients and might determine a significant impact on their quality of life, yet it is still under identified by both clinicians and patients. This perspective aims to discuss the implications of patients' and healthcare professionals' lack of awareness on the matter and argues about the importance of improving the level of information on CRCI to mitigate difficulties in identifying and managing such manifestations on various levels.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.