Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39530499›Full record

ArticleConservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology2025

Effects of snake fungal disease (ophidiomycosis) on the skin microbiome across two major experimental scales.

Alexander S Romer, Matthew Grisnik, Jason W Dallas, William Sutton, Christopher M Murray, Rebecca H Hardman, Tom Blanchard, Ryan J Hanscom, Rulon W Clark, Cody Godwin and 16 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Effects of snake fungal disease (ophidiomycosis) on the skin microbiome across two major experimental scales.Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

26 authors.

Alexander S RomerDepartment of Biology, Middle Tennessee State University, Murfreesboro, Tennessee, USA.
Matthew GrisnikDepartment of Biology, Coastal Carolina University, Conway, South Carolina, USA.
Jason W DallasDepartment of Biology, Middle Tennessee State University, Murfreesboro, Tennessee, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3159-0985
William SuttonDepartment of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, Tennessee State University, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
Christopher M MurrayDepartment of Biological Sciences, Southeastern Louisiana University, Hammond, Louisiana, USA.
Rebecca H HardmanCenter for Wildlife Health, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee, USA.
Tom BlanchardDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Tennessee at Martin, Martin, Tennessee, USA.
Ryan J HanscomDepartment of Biology, San Diego State University, San Diego, California, USA.
Rulon W ClarkDepartment of Biology, San Diego State University, San Diego, California, USA.
Cody GodwinDepartment of Natural Sciences, Santa Fe College, Gainesville, Florida, USA.
N Reed AlexanderDepartment of Biology, Middle Tennessee State University, Murfreesboro, Tennessee, USA.
Kylie C MoeDepartment of Biology, Middle Tennessee State University, Murfreesboro, Tennessee, USA.
Vincent A CobbDepartment of Biology, Middle Tennessee State University, Murfreesboro, Tennessee, USA.
Jesse EakerDepartment of Natural Sciences, Santa Fe College, Gainesville, Florida, USA.
Rob ColvinTennessee Wildlife Resources Agency, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
Dustin ThamesTennessee Wildlife Resources Agency, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
Chris OgleTennessee Wildlife Resources Agency, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
Josh CampbellTennessee Wildlife Resources Agency, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
Carlin FrostDepartment of Biology, Coastal Carolina University, Conway, South Carolina, USA.
Rachel L BrubakerDepartment of Biology, Coastal Carolina University, Conway, South Carolina, USA.
Shawn D SnyderDepartment of Wildlife, Fisheries and Conservation Biology, University of Maine, Orono, Maine, USA.
Alexander J RurikDepartment of Biology, Middle Tennessee State University, Murfreesboro, Tennessee, USA.
Chloe E CumminsDepartment of Biology, Middle Tennessee State University, Murfreesboro, Tennessee, USA.
David W LudwigDepartment of Computer Science, Middle Tennessee State University, Murfreesboro, Tennessee, USA.
Joshua L PhillipsDepartment of Computer Science, Middle Tennessee State University, Murfreesboro, Tennessee, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4619-6083
Donald M WalkerDepartment of Biology, Middle Tennessee State University, Murfreesboro, Tennessee, USA.

Funding

Division of Emerging Frontiers 2125065Division of Environmental Biology 1933925Division of Environmental Biology CAREER 2236580Division of Mathematical Sciences REU 1757493Tennessee Wildlife Resources Agency State Wildlife Grant 58209
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Emerging infectious diseases are increasingly recognized as a significant threat to global biodiversity conservation. Elucidating the relationship between pathogens and the host microbiome could lead to novel approaches for mitigating disease impacts. Pathogens can alter the host microbiome by inducing dysbiosis, an ecological state characterized by a reduction in bacterial alpha diversity, an increase in pathobionts, or a shift in beta diversity. We used the snake fungal disease (SFD; ophidiomycosis), system to examine how an emerging pathogen may induce dysbiosis across two experimental scales. We used quantitative polymerase chain reaction, bacterial amplicon sequencing, and a deep learning neural network to characterize the skin microbiome of free-ranging snakes across a broad phylogenetic and spatial extent. Habitat suitability models were used to find variables associated with fungal presence on the landscape. We also conducted a laboratory study of northern watersnakes to examine temporal changes in the skin microbiome following inoculation with Ophidiomyces ophidiicola. Patterns characteristic of dysbiosis were found at both scales, as were nonlinear changes in alpha and alterations in beta diversity, although structural-level and dispersion changes differed between field and laboratory contexts. The neural network was far more accurate (99.8% positive predictive value [PPV]) in predicting disease state than other analytic techniques (36.4% PPV). The genus Pseudomonas was characteristic of disease-negative microbiomes, whereas, positive snakes were characterized by the pathobionts Chryseobacterium, Paracoccus, and Sphingobacterium. Geographic regions suitable for O. ophidiicola had high pathogen loads (>0.66 maximum sensitivity + specificity). We found that pathogen-induced dysbiosis of the microbiome followed predictable trends, that disease state could be classified with neural network analyses, and that habitat suitability models predicted habitat for the SFD pathogen.

Indexed as

ColubridaeMicrobiotaOnygenalesSkinAnimalsSkin Microbiomedeep learning neural networkdisbiosisdysbiosisenfermedades de la faunaenfermedad fúngica en serpientesmicrobioma dérmicored neural de aprendizaje profundoskin microbiomesnake fungal diseasewildlife diseases关键词: 皮肤微生物组深度学习神经网络菌群失调蛇真菌病野生动物疾病

Identifiers

PMID39530499
PMCPMC11959348

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.