ReviewMass spectrometry reviews
A Perspective of Multi-Reflecting TOF MS.
Review in Mass spectrometry reviews. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Advances in the Design and Functionality of a Compact Multi-Reflecting Time-of-Flight Mass Spectrometer.Rapid communications in mass spectrometry : RCM · 2026Article
- Comprehensive distribution analysis of cyclosporin A on mice tissues applying mass spectrometry imaging.Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry · 2026Article
- A Novel Compact Multi-Reflecting Time-of-Flight Mass Spectrometer.Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry · 2026Article
- Identifying space-resolved proteins of the murine thymus, by combining MALDI-MSI and proteomics.Life science alliance · 2026Article
- A novel method for real-time adulteration identification of heated-honey processed Astragali radix using REIMS-iKnife and its regulatory effects on gut microbiota, SCFAs, and immune function in spleen-deficient rats.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Article
- Mass Spectrometry Imaging.Analytical chemistry · 2025Review
- Top-Down and Middle-Down Mass Spectrometry of Antibodies.Molecular & cellular proteomics : MCP · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Time-of-flight mass spectrometry (TOF MS) excels in rapid and high-sensitivity analysis, making it a cornerstone of analytical chemistry. But as sample complexity explodes in omics studies, so does the need for higher resolving power to ensure accurate results. Traditional TOF instruments face a challenge: achieving high resolution often requires a very large instrument. To overcome this limitation, scientists developed alternative designs for TOF analyzers called multi-pass TOF analyzers (MPT). These MPT analyzers come in two main configurations: multi-turn (MTT) and multi-reflecting (MRT). Drawing on the authors' extensive experience, this review describes two decades of MPT advancements. It highlights the critical development of optimized analyzer designs, tracing the evolution towards mirror-based MRT instruments, generally providing superior resolution and spatial acceptance compared to MTT. While the manuscript attempts to overview MTT advances, it primarily focuses on MRT technology. Additionally, the review explores the role of orthogonal accelerators and trap pulse converters, comparing their efficiency and the dynamic range limits imposed by space charge effects. By comparing various MRT configurations and commercially available instruments, the review sets out to inform and empower researchers so they can make informed decisions about MRT mass spectrometers.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.