Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39530232›Full record

SynthesisBJU international2025

Real-world use of androgen-deprivation therapy intensification for metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer: a systematic review.

Amit D Raval, Stephanie Chen, Natasha Littleton, Niculae Constantinovici, Peter J Goebell

Registry-linked trialAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BJU international, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07572760 (Low to Moderate Load Power Training as an Exercise Intervention for Men With Metastatic Prostate Cancer Undergoing Androgen Deprivation Therapy.), which is not on this map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07572760 narecruitingnot on this map

Low to Moderate Load Power Training as an Exercise Intervention for Men With Metastatic Prostate Cancer Undergoing Androgen Deprivation Therapy.

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of AlicanteRan2024 to 2026Enrolled66ConditionsProstatic NeoplasmsArmsPower training group
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Amit D RavalBayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc., Whippany, NJ, USA.
Stephanie ChenBayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc., Whippany, NJ, USA.
Natasha LittletonBayer Ltd, Dublin, Ireland.
Niculae ConstantinoviciBayer Consumer Care, Basel, Switzerland.
Peter J GoebellDepartment of Urology, University Clinic Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0176-4478

Funding

Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals, Inc (Whippany, NJ, USA)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo conduct a systematic literature review of real-world data (RWD) studies to summarise treatment patterns among men with metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC). While androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT) is a primary treatment strategy for mHSPC, ADT intensification with androgen receptor pathway inhibitors (ARPIs) and/or chemotherapy is recommended by current guidelines and has improved clinical outcomes in the last decade.

methodsWe searched electronic databases (PubMed; Excerpta Medica dataBASE [EMBASE]) for eligible studies (retrospective or prospective observational RWD studies examining mHSPC treatment patterns) between database inception and July 2023, and manually screened the past 2 years of relevant conference proceedings.

resultsOf 2336 retrieved citations, 29 studies met the inclusion criteria, covering North America (United States, n = 21; Canada, n = 2), Europe (n = 8), and Asia (n = 6). Most studies utilised retrospective cohorts (n = 26) and included men with a median age of ≥70 years (n = 20). ADT monotherapy was predominantly used across geographies, followed by ADT + ARPI and ADT + docetaxel in the United States and Europe but not in Asia, where use of each combination remained low. Studies with recent electronic medical record data from cancer centres/registries showed >40% use of ADT + ARPI in the United States and Europe. Abiraterone was the most frequently used ARPI, followed by enzalutamide. Quantitative factors associated with ADT intensification were high disease burden, younger age, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status score of 0 to 1, fewer comorbidities, and oncologist physician specialty; qualitative factors were patient preference, unsatisfactory response to ADT, ability to tolerate adverse events, and absence of cost barriers.

conclusionWhile there was an increasing trend in ADT intensification for mHSPC over the study period across geographies, use remained suboptimal considering the high proportion of patients who were still receiving ADT monotherapy only. These findings highlight the need for interventions to further optimise current mHSPC therapies with high guideline concordance.

Indexed as

Androgen AntagonistsAndrogen Receptor AntagonistsProstatic NeoplasmsHumansMaleAndrogen AntagonistsAndrogen Receptor Antagonistsandrogen‐deprivation therapyandrogen receptor pathway inhibitorsmetastatic hormone‐sensitive prostate cancerreal worldtreatment patterns

Identifiers

PMID39530232
PMCPMC11842892

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.