Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39530190›Full record

ArticlePolitics and the life sciences : the journal of the Association for Politics and the Life Sciences2025

Strategic policy options to improve quality and productivity of biomedical research.

E Andrew Balas, Gianluca De Leo, Kelly B Shaw

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Politics and the life sciences : the journal of the Association for Politics and the Life Sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

E Andrew BalasBiomedical Research Innovation Laboratory, Augusta University, Augusta, GA, USA.
Gianluca De LeoBiomedical Research Innovation Laboratory, Augusta University, Augusta, GA, USA.
Kelly B ShawDepartment of Political Science, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, USA.

Funding

SCISIPBIO: Distinguishing practices of outstanding productivity and expansion in biomedical researchR01GM146338 · NIGMS · AUGUSTA UNIVERSITY · PI BALAS, E ANDREW · 2021 to 2023
$609k
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM146338NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM146338-01NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM146338-02
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Emerging societal expectations from biomedical research and intensifying international scientific competition are becoming existential matters. Based on a review of pertinent evidence, this article analyzes challenges and formulates public policy recommendations for improving productivity and impact of life sciences. Critical risks include widespread quality defects of research, particularly non-reproducible results, and narrow access to scientifically sound information giving advantage to health misinformation. In funding life sciences, the simultaneous shift to nondemocratic societies is an added challenge. Simply spending more on research will not be enough in the global competition. Considering the pacesetter role of the federal government, five national policy recommendations are put forward: (i) funding projects with comprehensive expectations of reproducibility; (ii) public-private partnerships for contemporaneous quality support in laboratories; (iii) making research institutions accountable for quality control; (iv) supporting new quality filtering standards for scientific journals and repositories, and (v) establishing a new network of centers for scientific health communications.

Indexed as

Biomedical ResearchPublic PolicyHumansPublic-Private Sector PartnershipsQuality Controlbiomedical researchhealth communicationhealth misinformationinternational scientific competitionpublic policyquality and reproducibility

Identifiers

PMID39530190
PMCPMC11968251

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.