Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39530066›Full record

ArticleRevista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia2024

Validation of Brazilian Version of the Sexual Desire Inventory 2 (SDI-2).

Denisse Cartagena-Ramos, Miguel Fuentealba-Torres, Flávio Rebustini, Josilene Alves, Alessandro Scholze, Lúcia Alves da Silva Lara, Ricardo Arcêncio, Lucila Castanheira Nascimento

Abstract readValidation Study
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Denisse Cartagena-RamosUniversidad Andrés Bello Facultad de Enfermería Santiago Chile Facultad de Enfermería, Universidad Andrés Bello, Santiago, Chile.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8828-2190
Miguel Fuentealba-TorresUniversidad de los Andes Santiago Chile Universidad de los Andes, Santiago, Chile.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4343-6341
Flávio RebustiniUniversidade de São Paulo Escola de Artes, Ciências e Humanidades São PauloSP Brazil Escola de Artes, Ciências e Humanidades, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3746-3266
Josilene AlvesUniversidade Federal do Mato Grosso CuiabáMT Brazil Universidade Federal do Mato Grosso, Cuiabá, MT, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5007-9536
Alessandro ScholzeUniversidade Estadual do Norte de Paraná JacarezinhoPR Brazil Universidade Estadual do Norte de Paraná, Jacarezinho, PR, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3931-9110
Lúcia Alves da Silva LaraUniversidade de São Paulo Faculty of Medicine of Ribeirão Preto Ribeirão PretoSP Brazil Faculty of Medicine of Ribeirão Preto, Universidade de São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1073-238X
Ricardo ArcêncioUniversidade de São Paulo Escola de Enfermagem São PauloSP Brazil Escola de Enfermagem, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4792-8714
Lucila Castanheira NascimentoUniversidade de São Paulo Escola de Enfermagem de Ribeirão Preto Ribeirão PretoSP Brazil Escola de Enfermagem de Ribeirão Preto, Universidade de São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7900-7111

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To traslate and validate of the Brazilian version of the SDI-2. Methods: This was a cross-sectional study. The cultural adaptation considered the stages of initial translation, synthesis of translations, evaluation by a committee of experts from different regions of Brazil, back-translation, and pre-test. The content validity and psychometric proprieties was assessed. Results: Ten specialists participated in the cultural adaptation of the SDI-2. The content validity showed a Content Validity Ratio (CVR) ≥ 0.75 ( Conclusion: The Brazilian version of the SDI-2 is self-report, valid, reliable and invariant across sex.

Indexed as

TranslationsAdolescentAdultBrazilCross-Sectional StudiesCultural CharacteristicsFemaleHumansLibidoMaleMiddle AgedPsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung AdultCross-cultural comparisonLibidoPsychometricsSexual behaviorSexual desireSurveys and questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID39530066
PMCPMC11554335

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.