Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39530051›Full record

ArticleProceedings. IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging2024

DIFFUSION MODEL-BASED POSTERIOR DISTRIBUTION PREDICTION FOR KINETIC PARAMETER ESTIMATION IN DYNAMIC PET.

Y Djebra, X Liu, T Marin, A Tiss, M Dhaynaut, N Guehl, K Johnson, G El Fakhri, C Ma, J Ouyang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings. IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Y DjebraMassachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
X LiuMassachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
T MarinMassachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
A TissMassachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
M DhaynautMassachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
N GuehlMassachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
K JohnsonMassachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
G El FakhriYale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
C MaMassachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
J OuyangMassachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.

Funding

Unified Joint Statistical Reconstruction of PET & MRP41EB022544 · NIBIB · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI Kira Grogg · 2017 to 2026
$14.8M
Methods for Quantitative Neuroimaging of Tau Burden inPre-symptomatic ADR01AG076153 · NIA · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI Georges El Fakhri, Marc David Normandin · 2022 to 2026
$3.0M
Improving Image-Guided Radiation Therapy of Gliomas with High-Resolution MR Spectroscopic ImagingR01EB033582 · NIBIB · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI Chao Ma · 2022 to 2026
$2.0M
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG076153NIBIB NIH HHS P41 EB022544NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB033582
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Positron Emission Tomography (PET) is a valuable imaging method for studying molecular-level processes in the body, such as hyperphosphorylated tau (p-tau) protein aggregates, a hallmark of several neurodegenerative diseases including Alzheimer's disease. P-tau density and cerebral perfusion can be quantified from PET data using tracer kinetic modeling techniques. However, noise in PET images leads to uncertainty in the estimated kinetic parameters. This can be quantified in a Bayesian framework by the posterior distribution of kinetic parameters given PET measurements. Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) techniques can be employed to estimate the posterior distribution, although with significant computational needs. In this paper, we propose to leverage deep learning inference efficiency to infer the posterior distribution. A novel approach using denoising diffusion probabilistic model (DDPM) is introduced. The performance of the proposed method was evaluated on a [18F]MK6240 study and compared to an MCMC method. Our approach offered significant reduction in computation time (over 30 times faster than MCMC) and consistently predicted accurate (< 0.8 % mean error) and precise (< 5.77 % standard deviation error) posterior distributions.

Indexed as

Deep learningDiffusion modelsDynamic PET imagingKinetic modelingPosterior distribution

Identifiers

PMID39530051
PMCPMC11554386

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.