ArticleOncoTargets and therapy2024
Utilizing Saliva Metabolomics for Diagnosing Gastric Cancer and Exploring the Changes in Saliva Metabolites After Surgery.
Article in OncoTargets and therapy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- The oral-gastric microbial axis in children: salivary signatures as non-invasive biomarkers for pediatric gastritis andFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Review
- Metabolic Features of Saliva Before and After Breast Cancer Surgery.Metabolites · 2025Article
- Advancements and Challenges in Salivary Metabolomics for Early Detection and Monitoring of Systemic Diseases.MedComm · 2025Review
- Identifying the Primary Tumor Site and Distinguishing False-positives in Patients With Elevated Serum Carcinoembryonic Antigen.In vivo (Athens, Greece)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Gastric cancer (GC) is a disease with high prevalence and mortality, but we lack convenient and accurate methods to screen for this disease. Thus, we aimed to search for some salivary biomarkers and explore changes in metabolites in patients' saliva after radical gastrectomy. Patients and Methods: A total of 152 subjects were divided into three groups (healthy group, GC group, and one-week postoperative group). After simple processing, saliva samples were analyzed by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry. First, we used total ion chromatography and principal component analysis to determine the metabolite profiles. Next, Results: Between the healthy and GC groups, we identified four biomarkers: lactic acid, kynurenic acid, 3-hydroxystachydrine, and S-(1,2,2-trichlorovinyl)-L-cysteine. We used stepwise regression to select five metabolites and develop a model with areas under the curve equal to 0.973 in the training dataset and 0.924 in the validation dataset. Between the GC and one-week postoperative groups, we found two differential metabolites: 19-hydroxyprostaglandin E Conclusion: Differential metabolites were observed among the three groups. GC could be initially diagnosed on the basis of detection of these biomarkers. Moreover, changes in salivary metabolites in postoperative patients could provide important insights for basic studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.