ArticleArchives of endocrinology and metabolism2024
PTH immunoassay interference: differential diagnosis with normocalcemic primary hyperparathyroidism?
Article in Archives of endocrinology and metabolism, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The main diagnostic dilemma in normocalcemic hyperparathyroidism is differentiating this condition from secondary hyperparathyroidism and other causes of elevated parathyroid hormone (PTH) levels in eucalcemic patients, including potential assay interferences. Despite the analytical sensitivity of immunoassays, they may lack adequate accuracy due to several analytical interferences, such as the presence of heterophilic antibodies. Immunoassays for PTH measurement use the immunometric "sandwich" technique, and only a few cases of interference with this assay have been reported to date. We describe herein two patients in whom PTH immunoassay interference was demonstrated. Both patients presented high serum PTH levels, measured using a second-generation Roche electrochemiluminescence assay (ECLIA; Elecsys Roche, Germany), and normocalcemia. When immunoassay interference was suspected, PTH measurements were repeated using a different analytical platform, the 1-84 PTH third-generation Roche Elecsys ECLIA, resulting in normal levels. We subsequently performed serial dilutions using normal mouse serum with the second-generation ECLIA and found no linearity, indicating the presence of interference in both patients. Immunoassay interference may lead to misinterpretation of a patient's results by the laboratory and incorrect treatment planning by the attending physician. Despite its rarity, the presence of interferences in the PTH immunoassay resulting in falsely high PTH levels should be considered when the laboratory result does not match the patient's clinical presentation, thus preventing erroneous diagnoses and unnecessary therapeutic procedures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.