Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39529931›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2024

Accumulation of coumaric acid is a key factor in tobacco continuous cropping obstacles.

Meng Jia, Xingsong Wang, Xuanquan Zhu, Yu Du, Peng Zhou, Ge Wang, Na Wang, Yuxiang Bai

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Responses ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Meng Jia *College of Tobacco Science, Yunnan Agricultural University, Kunming, China.
Xingsong Wang *College of Tobacco Science, Yunnan Agricultural University, Kunming, China.
Xuanquan ZhuCollege of Tobacco Science, Yunnan Agricultural University, Kunming, China.
Yu DuCollege of Tobacco Science, Yunnan Agricultural University, Kunming, China.
Peng ZhouCollege of Tobacco Science, Yunnan Agricultural University, Kunming, China.
Ge WangCollege of Tobacco Science, Yunnan Agricultural University, Kunming, China.
Na WangCollege of Tobacco Science, Yunnan Agricultural University, Kunming, China.
Yuxiang BaiCollege of Tobacco Science, Yunnan Agricultural University, Kunming, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Phenolic acids are believed to play a significant role in tobacco continuous cropping obstacles, but the strength and potential mechanisms of different phenolic acids remain unclear. Methods: This study evaluated the allelopathic effects of six phenolic acids that exhibited cumulative effects in our previous research. Different concentrations of phenolic acids with the strongest allelopathic effects were added to potting soil to explore their impacts on tobacco growth and physiological characteristics, as well as on soil chemical properties and microbial community structure. Results: The results showed that coumaric acid exhibited the strongest direct allelopathic effect. Exogenous coumaric acid significantly reduced soil pH and shifted the soil microbial community from bacteria-dominated to fungi-dominated. Simultaneously, the abundance of bacteria related to nutrient utilization (e.g., Discussion: Coumaric acid may inhibit tobacco growth by influencing the physiological processes in tobacco plants directly and the broader soil microecological balance indirectly. This study provides theoretical guidance for precise mitigation of continuous cropping obstacles in future tobacco cultivation.

Indexed as

allelopathic effectscontinuous cropping obstaclescoumaric acidphenolic acidssoil microecologytobacco

Identifiers

PMID39529931
PMCPMC11552174

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.