ReviewFrontiers in physiology2024
From amoeboid myosin to unique targeted medicines for a genetic cardiac disease.
Review in Frontiers in physiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Editorial: Release of inorganic phosphate from the myosin active site in actomyosin energy transduction.Frontiers in physiology · 2026Article
- Mechanistic insights into effects of the cardiac myosin activator omecamtiv mecarbil from mechanokinetic modelling.Frontiers in physiology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
The importance of fundamental basic research in the quest for much needed clinical treatments is a story that constantly must be retold. Funding of basic science in the USA by the National Institutes of Health and other agencies is provided under the assumption that fundamental research eventually will lead to improvements in healthcare worldwide. Understanding how basic research is connected to clinical developments is important, but just part of the story. Many basic science discoveries never see the light of day in a clinical setting because academic scientists are not interested in or do not have the inclination and/or support for entering the world of biotechnology. Even if the interest and inclination are there, often the unknowns about how to enter that world inhibit taking the initial step. Young investigators often ask me how I incorporated biotech opportunities into my otherwise purely academic research endeavors. Here I tell the story of the foundational basic science and early events of my career that led to forming the biotech companies responsible for the development of unique cardiac drugs, including mavacamten, a first in class human β-cardiac myosin inhibitor that is changing the lives of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.