ArticleCureus2024
Understanding the Impact COVID-19 Has Had on Traumatic Ankle Fractures in a UK Orthopaedic Department: Should Current Guidelines Be Revised?
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction Ankle fractures are common yet debilitating injuries. Surgery is the mainstay treatment for ankle fractures displaying a high suspicion of instability. During the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, conservative management became prominent in patients with ankle fractures. This study assesses the variation in ankle fracture management during the COVID-19 versus pre-COVID-19 pandemic and also highlights how the lockdown affected patient's behaviour. Methods Data for patients with acute ankle fractures during the COVID-19 pandemic (March-June 2020) were retrieved using an electronic trauma database (eTrauma, Open Medical, London, UK). Patients were categorised as operative versus non-operative. The same data were extrapolated from eTrauma for pre-COVID times (March-June 2019). Data were cross-checked with inpatient notes. Patient demographics, mechanism of injury, patient outcomes (Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS)) and delay in presentation were also analysed. Result There was an increased number of acute ankle fractures referred to the orthopaedic department during the COVID-19 pandemic (n=161, 78.9% increase). However, 52% more cases were managed conservatively when compared with pre-COVID times. We also identified an increased presentation time from the date of injury to the orthopaedic review, along with a non-statistically significant decreased delay to surgery during the COVID-19 pandemic (p=0.131). Compared to 2019, FAOS scores were greater during the COVID-19 pandemic (p=0.049), despite no difference in the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade between the two time periods. Conclusion Compared to the pre-COVID-19 pandemic period, more ankle fractures were managed conservatively in 2020, despite no significant difference found in baseline morbidity. In addition, patient outcomes were greater in 2020. Based on the data analysed, it would be prudent to review current ankle fracture management guidelines and consider a lower threshold for conservative management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.