ArticleFrontiers in pharmacology2024
Sequential versus concomitant treatment of androgen receptor signaling inhibitors and docetaxel for metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer: an network meta-analysis.
Article in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Androgen receptor signaling inhibitors (ARSis), when administered sequentially or in combination with docetaxel and androgen deprivation therapy (ADT), have been shown to enhance overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC). Nonetheless, the optimal sequence for administering chemotherapy and ARSis remains to be determined. Objective: To compare the efficacy of ARSis sequential therapy with ARSis combined therapy for mHSPC, and to evaluate the efficacy and safety of different combination regimens. Methods: The PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central, and ClinicalTrials.gov databases were searched from their inception through 14 July 2024, to identify eligible phase III randomized clinical trials (RCTs) evaluating the combination or sequential use of docetaxel + ADT with abiraterone, enzalutamide, apalutamide, or darolutamide. The outcomes of interest included OS, PFS, time to prostate-specific antigen (PSA) progression, grade 3-5 adverse events (AEs), and serious adverse events (SAEs). Results: Five RCTs involving 2836 patients were included in the analysis. When comparing ARSis sequential therapy to ARSis combined therapy, no significant differences were observed in OS (Hazard Ratio (HR): 1.17, 95% Confidence Interval (CI): 0.69-1.96), PFS (HR: 1.03, 95% CI: 0.47-2.22), or time to PSA progression (HR: 0.48, 95% CI: 0.03-7.69). Within the different ARSis combined regimens, the triple therapies involving enzalutamide, abiraterone, and darolutamide demonstrated comparable efficacy and safety profiles in the overall population, and their efficacy in patients with high-volume disease or low-volume disease was also similar. Conclusion: ARSis sequential therapy did not significantly differ from ARSis combined therapy in improving OS and PFS among patients with mHSPC, and thus can be considered as a viable treatment option.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.