ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2024
Patient-reported and Clinical Outcomes following Gender-affirming Chest Surgery: A Comparison of Binary and Nonbinary Transmasculine Individuals.
Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Experiences and challenges of sexual and gender minority patients undergoing breast cancer treatment.American journal of surgery · 2026Article
- Safety and quality outcomes of same-day discharge for gender-affirming mastectomy during the pandemic.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Nonbinary individuals assigned female at birth are increasingly presenting for gender-affirming chest surgery (GCS). However, little is known about psychosocial outcomes in this group. We compare patient-reported and clinical outcomes after GCS between nonbinary and binary transmasculine individuals who underwent GCS. Methods: We performed an institutional retrospective chart review. Demographic information, medical comorbidities, history of gender-affirming medical care, operative details, and complications were collected and compared between nonbinary and binary patients. Two validated patient-reported outcomes measures, the Gender Congruence and Life Satisfaction (GCLS) scale and the chest dysphoria measure were administered postoperatively. Results: A total of 281 patients were included, of which 40.6% (114) identified as nonbinary and 59.4% (167) identified as binary transgender men. Fewer nonbinary patients used testosterone ( Conclusions: Nonbinary individuals have similarly positive outcomes following GCS compared with binary individuals. Surgeons should be aware of greater medical and surgical heterogeneity in this population and seek to understand individual patients' goals and priorities.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.