ArticlePNAS nexus2024
Complexity and entropy of natural patterns.
Article in PNAS nexus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Development of brain metastable dynamics during the equivalent of the third gestational trimester.Developmental cognitive neuroscience · 2025Review
- Daily Max Simplified Wet-Bulb Globe Temperature and its Climate Networks for Teleconnection Study, 1940-2022.Scientific data · 2025Article
- Land system changes of terrestrial tipping elements on Earth under global climate pledges: 2000-2100.Scientific data · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Complexity and entropy play crucial roles in understanding dynamic systems across various disciplines. Many intuitively perceive them as distinct measures and assume that they have a concave-down relationship. In everyday life, there is a common consensus that while entropy never decreases, complexity does decrease after an initial increase during the process of blending coffee and milk. However, this consensus is primarily conceptual and lacks empirical evidence. Here, we provide comprehensive evidence that challenges this prevailing consensus. We demonstrate that this consensus is, in fact, an illusion resulting from the choice of system characterization (dimension) and the unit of observation (resolution). By employing a complexity measure designed for natural patterns, we find that the complexity of a coffee-milk system never decreases if the system is appropriately characterized in terms of dimension and resolution. Also, this complexity aligns experimentally and theoretically with entropy, suggesting that it does not represent a measure of so-called effective complexity. These findings rectify the prevailing conceptual consensus and reshape our understanding of the relationship between complexity and entropy. It is therefore crucial to exercise caution and pay close attention to accurately and precisely characterize dynamic systems before delving into their underlying mechanisms, despite the maturity of characterization research in various fields dealing with natural patterns such as geography and ecology. The characterization/observation (dimension and resolution) of a system fundamentally determines the assessment of complexity and entropy using existing measures and our understanding.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.