ArticleFrontiers in veterinary science2024
Caretaker-reported quality of life, functionality, and complications associated with assistive mobility cart use in companion animals.
Article in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Caregiver burden and psychosocial outcomes in owners of dogs with chronic paresis and paralysis compared with owners of healthy dogs.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2026Article
- Comparing caregiver burden in owners of healthy dogs with and without limb amputation: a cross-sectional analysis.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the impact of assistive mobility carts on companion animals and caretakers' quality of life by investigating factors pertaining to caretaker satisfaction, the ability to perform daily tasks, and complication rates. Materials and methods: A 23-question survey was distributed to caretakers of animals using carts to evaluate the animal and caretakers' quality of life, acceptance, ability to complete functional tasks, and complications. Data from canine, feline, and rabbit responses were analyzed separately. Results: Dogs and cats had improved quality of life in 62 and 57% of responses and 61 and 60% for their caretakers, respectively. There was no improvement in the quality of life of rabbits or their caretakers. Regarding the complication rate, 64% were reported to have at least one complication associated with cart use, 53% of which were wounds. Across all species, there was a reported improvement in ability to perform daily tasks and activities. Conclusions and clinical relevance: Caretakers reported that assistive mobility carts improve both companion animals' and caretakers' quality of life, despite high prevalence of complications, including wounds. Future studies exploring specific disease conditions and long-term outcomes will be useful for guiding clinical recommendations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.