SynthesisFrontiers in oncology2024
A bibliometric and visualization analysis of entosis research from 2007 to 2024.
Synthesis in Frontiers in oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: In 2007, entosis was proposed as a form of programmed cell death, distinct from apoptosis. This process involves a living cell (internalized cell) actively invading a neighboring live cell of the same type (host cell), forming a cell-in-cell structure. Recently, entosis has been increasingly associated with cancer, leading to significant advancements in research. Despite this progress, a comprehensive and unbiased review of the current state of entosis research is lacking. This study aims to evaluate the developments in the field of entosis over the past decade and highlight emerging research trends. Materials and methods: We performed a literature search for studies published since the introduction of the entosis concept, using the Web of Science Core Collection database. The bibliometric analysis was conducted using VOSviewer, CiteSpace, Microsoft Excel, and the Bibliometrix R package. Results: A total of 196 articles from 39 countries and 346 institutions were included. Between 2007 and 2024, research on entosis has seen rapid growth, with most publications originating from China and the United States. The United States also leads in total citations, with Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center emerging as the top research institution. Sun Qiang is the most prolific author in this field, while Overholtzer M has the highest number of citations. Conclusions: This study provides the first bibliometric analysis of entosis, detailing its evolution over the last decade. It highlights critical areas of interest, including the development of inhibitors targeting entosis and their potential clinical applications. This research aims to guide future investigations and serve as a valuable resource for scholars exploring entosis in cancer biology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.