ReviewThe Lancet regional health. Europe2024
Solidarity and trust in European Union health governance: three ways forward.
Review in The Lancet regional health. Europe, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Transformative Resilience in European Health Governance After COVID-19: A Policy Analysis.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- 20 Years of EU health values (2006-2026): four proposals for the future.The Lancet regional health. Europe · 2026Article
- Lessons from the G5 Health Cooperation in West Asia: 20 Years After Establishment.Medical journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran · 2025Article
- How the world of biobanking is changing with artificial intelligence.Frontiers in digital health · 2025Review
- Factors influencing national public health governance capacity: based on NCA and fsQCA.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- Health, the missing chapter in the Draghi Report on Europe's future.The Lancet regional health. Europe · 2025Article
- A health union in support of European and national health solidarity.The Lancet regional health. Europe · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Trust and solidarity are centrally important to the functioning of healthcare systems, and for societal resilience and stability more broadly. The European Union is increasingly shaping governance and norms that affect trust and solidarity in health-a process that has intensified with the announcement of the 'European Health Union' in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. In this context, how can the EU ensure solidarity in health while generating public trust as a pre-condition for solidaristic institutions? We propose three strategies to reach this goal. First, both at national and European levels, institutions and mechanisms of solidarity should be strengthened. Second, the Union should boost the resilience and stability of national healthcare systems through mechanisms of risk-sharing. Third, the Union should mandate or encourage its member countries to enhance prevention and other public health policies to strengthen pre-distribution, aimed to ensure a more equal baseline of public health before inequalities arise.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.