ArticleCureus2024
Socioeconomic Trends in Palliative Care: A Six-Year Study.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Economic Disparities in Palliative Care Utilization Among Cancer Patients in Saudi Arabia: A Socioeconomic Stratification Analysis.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The use of palliative care (PC) is on the rise in the USA, with clear benefits to patients, families, hospitals, and insurance companies. Our study investigates trends in PC utilization, focusing on socioeconomic characteristics. The National Inpatient Sample (NIS) from 2015 to 2020 was used to identify adults hospitalized in the United States (US). International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision (ICD-10), was used for PC encounters, code Z51.5. An equal number of random records, stratified by year and without this code, were selected to serve as controls. Records were analyzed for baseline characteristics using a chi-square test. Adjusted odds ratios (ORs) of receiving PC were calculated using multivariate logistic regression. Men were more likely to receive PC consults (OR: 1.07, confidence interval (CI): 1.06-1.08). Medicare/Medicaid holders' PC access was limited compared to private insurance holders (0.89, 0.86-0.93). Racial minorities, particularly Hispanics (0.9, 0.86-0.95) and Blacks (0.83, 0.77-0.88), were less likely to engage in PC. Compared to urban teaching hospitals, rural hospitals had a decreased rate of PC utilization (0.53, 0.49-0.57). Smaller hospitals had significantly fewer PC referrals than large hospitals (0.80, 0.76-0.85). A lower socioeconomic status was associated with a reduced propensity to utilize PC services compared to an upper socioeconomic status (0.91, 0.87-0.96). Our analysis shows that socioeconomic factors strongly influence PC access. This highlights important inequities that require measures to improve equitable PC access across demographic groups.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.