ArticleCureus2024
Quantitative Determination of Salivary Cariogenic Bacteria in Patients With Fixed Orthodontic Appliances.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectivesFixed orthodontic treatment can alter the oral environment, potentially increasing cariogenic bacteria levels. This study aimed to utilize real-time polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) to quantify salivary levels of cariogenic bacteria in patients undergoing orthodontic treatment with fixed appliances.
methodsThis case-control study was conducted in Erbil, Iraq, from April 2024 to August 2024. One hundred participants were included in the study by random sampling method and equally divided into two groups: case group or orthodontic group and control group. The orthodontic group included participants with fixed orthodontic brackets, while the control group included participants without current or past orthodontic treatment with matching age and sex as the orthodontic group. Data were collected via questionnaires, clinical examinations, and saliva sampling. Salivary samples were analyzed using real-time PCR to detect
resultsThe age ranged from 18 to 30 years, and the mean age of participants was 23.96 ± 3.64 years. No significant differences were observed between the two groups across most parameters, except in the use of fluoride therapy, where the control group demonstrated better usage (p≤0.003). Real-time PCR results indicated a significant difference in the levels of LB and SM between patients with fixed orthodontics and the control group (p≤0.001). However, no significant differences were found in decay indices such as decayed, missing, and filled teeth; decayed, missing, and filled surfaces; and plaque index in this study.
conclusionsThe quantity and levels of LB and SM were higher in the orthodontic group compared to the control group. Despite the elevated bacterial levels in the orthodontic group, there was no significant difference in decay and plaque indices between the two groups.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.