ArticleCureus2024
Assessing Hemodialysis Catheter Insertion Practices Against CDC Guidelines: A Closed-Loop Audit at a Tertiary Hospital in Egypt.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Following evidence-based guidelines during hemodialysis catheter insertion procedures is key to lowering catheter-related bloodstream infections (CRBSI) and other complications. Our aim was to examine all aspects relevant to the insertion of hemodialysis catheters in the dialysis unit at Alexandria Main University Hospital, Alexandria, Egypt, in order to identify practices that could be contributing to high complication rates. Methods We used the CDC's Guidelines for the Prevention of Intravascular Catheter-Related Infections to define the criteria relevant to hemodialysis catheter insertion procedures. These criteria were made into a form to be used as the primary auditing tool. The form was then used to record catheterization procedures in the dialysis unit from March 2024 to July 2024. Eighty patients scheduled for hemodialysis catheter insertion were randomly selected, 40 in the initial cycle of the audit, and 40 in the re-audit cycle. Percentage adherence to each criterion was then calculated for each audit cycle and compared. Results Overall, adherence to the criteria assessed showed significant improvements, with mean compliance increasing from 69% in the initial cycle to 90% in the second cycle. In addition, the rate of mechanical complications recorded decreased. Conclusion Our study emphasized the effectiveness of using closed-loop clinical audits to ensure continuous improvement of care delivered during hemodialysis catheter insertion procedures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.