SynthesisFrontiers in psychology2024
Effectiveness of psychological interventions in endometriosis: a systematic review with meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Frontiers in psychology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Patient characteristics and lifestyle determinants of quality of life among women with endometriosis: a systematic review.Reproduction & fertility · 2026Pooled it
- Lifestyle factors and symptom burden in endometriosis: an exploratory mixed-methods analysis of nutrition, physical activity, and psychosocial well-being.BMC women's health · 2026Article
- Deep Dyspareunia One Year After Nerve-Sparing Endometriosis Surgery: An Observational Study Highlighting Undesirable Outcomes.Journal of personalized medicine · 2026Article
- A biopsychosocial perspective on endometriosis: the importance of psychological inflexibility.Archives of gynecology and obstetrics · 2026Article
- Article
- A review of treatment options for chronic pelvic pain from endometriosis.Pain management · 2025Review
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Endometriosis is a chronic gynecological disease associated with chronic debilitating pain, poor mental health and quality of life. The objective of this paper is to evaluate the effectiveness of psychological interventions aimed at improving the pain, quality of life and mental health of women with endometriosis. Methods: A systematic review (SR) of the literature with meta-analysis (MA) was carried out. MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO and CENTRAL were searched to locate Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs). The risk of bias assessment of each study was conducted using the Cochrane Collaboration's RoB 2.0 tool. Results: Seven RCTs were included ( Discussion: The available evidence indicates that psychological interventions are effective in improving the pain, quality of life and mental health variables of women with endometriosis. Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, CRD42024516100.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.