Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39529717›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2024

Leveraging digital tools to enhance diversity and inclusion in clinical trial recruitment.

Tosin Tomiwa, Erin Wong, Hailey N Miller, Oluwabunmi Ogungbe, Samuel Byiringiro, Timothy Plante, Cheryl R Himmelfarb

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Randomized Comparison of Online Motivational Themes in Clinical Trial Recruitment.Circulation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes · 2025
    Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Keeping Clinical Trials on an Inclusive Track.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026
    Article
  9. Observational
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Tosin TomiwaJohns Hopkins University School of Nursing, Baltimore, MD, United States.
Erin WongJohns Hopkins University School of Nursing, Baltimore, MD, United States.
Hailey N MillerJohns Hopkins University School of Nursing, Baltimore, MD, United States.
Oluwabunmi OgungbeJohns Hopkins University School of Nursing, Baltimore, MD, United States.
Samuel ByiringiroJohns Hopkins University School of Nursing, Baltimore, MD, United States.
Timothy PlanteThe Robert Larner, M.D. College of Medicine at The University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, United States.
Cheryl R HimmelfarbJohns Hopkins University School of Nursing, Baltimore, MD, United States.

Funding

NHLBI Maternal Morbidity and Mortality (3M) Administrative Coordinating CenterOT2HL158287 · NHLBI · WESTAT, INC. · PI Chanza Baytop · 2020 to 2026
$433.8M
Johns Hopkins Institute for Clinical and Translational ResearchUM1TR004926 · NCATS · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI STEPHEN N. DAVIS, Daniel Ernest Ford · 2024 to 2026
$28.5M
NCATS NIH HHS UM1 TR004926NHLBI NIH HHS OT2 HL158287
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Clinical research is pivotal in assessing the safety and efficacy of new treatments in healthcare. However, the success of such research depends on the inclusion of a diverse and representative participant sample, which is currently lacking. This lack of diversity in biomedical research participants has significant repercussions, limiting the real-world applicability and accessibility of medical interventions, especially for underrepresented groups. Barriers to diverse participation include historical mistrust, logistical challenges, and financial constraints. Recent guidelines by government agencies and funding bodies emphasize the need for diversity in clinical trials, but specific strategies for inclusive recruitment are often lacking. This paper explores the use of digital methods to enhance diversity and inclusion in research recruitment. Digital tools, such as electronic medical records, social media, research registries, and mobile applications, offer promising opportunities for reaching diverse populations. Strategies include culturally tailored messaging, collaborations with community organizations, and the use of SEO to improve visibility and engagement. However, challenges such as privacy concerns, digital literacy gaps, and ethical considerations must be addressed. The promotion of diversity in clinical research recruitment is crucial for advancing health equity. By leveraging digital tools and adopting inclusive strategies, study teams can improve the diversity of study participants, ultimately leading to more applicable and equitable healthcare outcomes.

Indexed as

Clinical Trials as TopicCultural DiversityPatient SelectionBiomedical ResearchElectronic Health RecordsHumansMobile ApplicationsSocial Mediadigital healthdigital methodsdiverse populationdiversity in clinical researchhealth equityinclusive recruitmentsocial media

Identifiers

PMID39529717
PMCPMC11550947

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.