ArticleFrontiers in public health2024
Leveraging digital tools to enhance diversity and inclusion in clinical trial recruitment.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Impact of Financial Incentives on Electronic Health Record-Driven Recruitment of Underrepresented Communities in Research: Randomized Controlled Trial.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Trial
- Canadian adaptive platform trial of treatments for COVID in community settings (CanTreatCOVID): recruitment strategies of a decentralized, national randomized controlled trial for acute SARS-CoV-2.Frontiers in public health · 2026Trial
- Randomized Comparison of Online Motivational Themes in Clinical Trial Recruitment.Circulation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes · 2025Trial
- Recruiting and Consenting Decentralized Clinical Trial Participants-Learnings from the Trials@Home RADIAL Proof-of-Concept Trial.Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics · 2025Trial
- Feasibility of EHR-based prescreening for an adjuvant breast cancer trial in a safety-net health system.The oncologist · 2026Article
- Social Media Influencer Marketing as a Clinical Trial Recruitment Modality: Tutorial Informed by One Study's Approach.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Racial and ethnic diversity in clinical studies reported to ClinicalTrials.gov, 2009-2024.BMJ open quality · 2026Article
- Keeping Clinical Trials on an Inclusive Track.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Sociodemographic Drivers of Recruitment and Attrition in Digital Neurological Research: Longitudinal Cohort Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Observational
- The OurHealth Study: A digital genomic cohort for cardiometabolic risk mechanisms in US South Asians.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Review
- Patient Preferences in Breast Cancer: A Scoping Review.Cancers · 2025Review
- Expanding horizons in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: The promise of induction chemoimmunotherapy with radiotherapy.World journal of clinical oncology · 2025Article
- Using media to enhance paediatric patient recruitment for research in primary care.Primary health care research & development · 2025Article
- Suicidal ideation and avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder: Findings from the ARFID-GEN study.Psychiatry research · 2025Article
- Virtual Data Collection Strategies in Research on Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementias (ADRD).Innovation in aging · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Clinical research is pivotal in assessing the safety and efficacy of new treatments in healthcare. However, the success of such research depends on the inclusion of a diverse and representative participant sample, which is currently lacking. This lack of diversity in biomedical research participants has significant repercussions, limiting the real-world applicability and accessibility of medical interventions, especially for underrepresented groups. Barriers to diverse participation include historical mistrust, logistical challenges, and financial constraints. Recent guidelines by government agencies and funding bodies emphasize the need for diversity in clinical trials, but specific strategies for inclusive recruitment are often lacking. This paper explores the use of digital methods to enhance diversity and inclusion in research recruitment. Digital tools, such as electronic medical records, social media, research registries, and mobile applications, offer promising opportunities for reaching diverse populations. Strategies include culturally tailored messaging, collaborations with community organizations, and the use of SEO to improve visibility and engagement. However, challenges such as privacy concerns, digital literacy gaps, and ethical considerations must be addressed. The promotion of diversity in clinical research recruitment is crucial for advancing health equity. By leveraging digital tools and adopting inclusive strategies, study teams can improve the diversity of study participants, ultimately leading to more applicable and equitable healthcare outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.