Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39529686›Full record

ArticleAcute medicine & surgery

Use of an eligibility checklist on arrival of emergency room as a registry system for corneal donation-A 9-year retrospective cohort study.

Haruaki Wakatake, Koichi Hayashi, Miyuki Kurisu, Minoru Yoshida, Ken Tsutsumi, Hiroki Saito, Yu Nomura, Toru Yoshida, Yuka Kitano, Yoshihiro Masui and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acute medicine & surgery. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Haruaki WakatakeDepartment of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine St. Marianna University, Yokohama Seibu Hospital Yokohama Kanagawa Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4468-9810
Koichi HayashiDepartment of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine St. Marianna University School of Medicine Kawasaki Kanagawa Japan.
Miyuki KurisuDepartment of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine St. Marianna University, Yokohama Seibu Hospital Yokohama Kanagawa Japan.
Minoru YoshidaDepartment of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine St. Marianna University, Yokohama Seibu Hospital Yokohama Kanagawa Japan.
Ken TsutsumiDepartment of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine St. Marianna University, Yokohama Seibu Hospital Yokohama Kanagawa Japan.
Hiroki SaitoDepartment of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine St. Marianna University School of Medicine Kawasaki Kanagawa Japan.
Yu NomuraDepartment of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine St. Marianna University School of Medicine Kawasaki Kanagawa Japan.
Toru YoshidaDepartment of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine St. Marianna University School of Medicine Kawasaki Kanagawa Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9341-9887
Yuka KitanoDepartment of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine St. Marianna University, Yokohama Seibu Hospital Yokohama Kanagawa Japan.
Yoshihiro MasuiDepartment of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine St. Marianna University, Yokohama Seibu Hospital Yokohama Kanagawa Japan.
Shigeki FujitaniDepartment of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine St. Marianna University School of Medicine Kawasaki Kanagawa Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aim: This study aimed to evaluate whether the use of an eligibility checklist uncovered potential corneal donors among deceased outpatients and increased the donation. Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, we applied the eligibility checklist to nearly all outpatients (age ≥ 18 y/o) who were transferred to our emergency department and identified as deceased between 2012 and 2020. Whether the use of the checklist contributed to the increase in corneal donation was examined, and the reasons for refusal of the donation were also evaluated. Furthermore, yearly changes in the number of the donation were assessed, with the data obtained before initiation of the checklist in 2010-2011 as references. The primary outcome was the number of corneal donors, with yearly changes in donation numbers assessed using data from 2010 to 2011 as a reference before the checklist was introduced. Results: Among 1776 outpatients to whom the eligibility checklist was applied, 1169 patients were regarded as potential donors. Of them, 126 families gave consent and 80 patients finally donated cornea; medical diseases as a cause of death were less likely to retract donation offer (OR = 0.31 [95% CI: 0.09-0.99]). The number of corneal donors in 2010-2011 corresponded to 1.6% of the deceased outpatients but increased since the checklist was introduced the total number of donors reached 87 (4.3%) during 2012-2020. Conclusion: A routine use of the eligibility checklist at the initial interview will reinforce the awareness of corneal donation among the families of patients and contribute to the increased number of corneal donors.

Indexed as

checklistcorneal donationemergency departmentopt‐in approachtransplantation

Identifiers

PMID39529686
PMCPMC11551474

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.