ArticleJournal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.)2024
Self-supervised learning for chest computed tomography: training strategies and effect on downstream applications.
Article in Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Self-Supervised Transformer-Based Pipeline for Liver Tumor Segmentation and Type Classification.JCO clinical cancer informatics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Self-supervised pre-training can reduce the amount of labeled training data needed by pre-learning fundamental visual characteristics of the medical imaging data. We investigate several self-supervised training strategies for chest computed tomography exams and their effects on downstream applications. Approach: We benchmark five well-known self-supervision strategies (masked image region prediction, next slice prediction, rotation prediction, flip prediction, and denoising) on 15 M chest computed tomography (CT) slices collected from four sites of the Mayo Clinic enterprise, United States. These models were evaluated for two downstream tasks on public datasets: pulmonary embolism (PE) detection (classification) and lung nodule segmentation. Image embeddings generated by these models were also evaluated for prediction of patient age, race, and gender to study inherent biases in models' understanding of chest CT exams. Results: The use of pre-training weights especially masked region prediction-based weights, improved performance, and reduced computational effort needed for downstream tasks compared with task-specific state-of-the-art (SOTA) models. Performance improvement for PE detection was observed for training dataset sizes as large as Conclusion: We released self-supervised models and weights under an open-source academic license. These models can then be fine-tuned with limited task-specific annotated data for a variety of downstream imaging tasks, thus accelerating research in biomedical imaging informatics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.