Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39529632›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2024

Exploring the value of hybrid capture-based next-generation sequencing technology in the suspected diagnosis of bloodstream infections.

Xinyuan Liu, Zhitao Gan, Zengshun Lin, Xiaojun Lin, Jianying Yuan, Lili Rong, Jiachang Chen, Jun Liu, Yingzhen Li, Chaohui Hu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Xinyuan LiuKingMed School of Laboratory Medicine, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Zhitao GanRespiratory and Critical Care Medicine Department, Jinshazhou Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Zengshun LinGuangzhou KingCreate Biotechnologies Co., Ltd., Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Xiaojun LinIntensive Care Department, Jinshazhou Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Jianying YuanGuangzhou KingCreate Biotechnologies Co., Ltd., Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Lili RongClinical Laboratory, Jinshazhou Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Jiachang ChenGuangzhou KingCreate Biotechnologies Co., Ltd., Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Jun LiuGuangzhou KingCreate Biotechnologies Co., Ltd., Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Yingzhen LiGuangzhou KingCreate Biotechnologies Co., Ltd., Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Chaohui HuKingMed School of Laboratory Medicine, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Determining the source of infection is significant for the treatment of bloodstream infections (BSI). The gold standard of blood infection detection, blood cultures, have low positive rates to meet clinical needs. In this study, we investigated the ability of hybrid capture-based next generation sequencing technology to detect pathogens in peripheral blood samples collected from patients with suspected BSI. Blood cultures and capture sequencing assays were also analyzed against the final clinical diagnoses. Methods: In this study, peripheral blood samples were collected from patients with fever, chills, and suspected BSI at Jinshazhou Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine from March 2023 to January 2024. All samples were tested by three different technologies: plasma capture sequencing technology, white blood cell capture sequencing technology, and blood culture. Relevant clinical diagnostic information was also collected. The performances of the blood cultures were then compared to those of both plasma capture sequencing technology and white blood cell capture sequencing technology. Results: A total of 98 patients were included in this study. The positive rates of probe capture next generation sequencing (NGS technology) in plasma and white blood cells were 81.63% and 65.31%, respectively, which were both significantly higher than that of the blood culture, which was 21.43% ( Conclusion: Our study demonstrates the high accuracy of probe capture sequencing technology compared to blood cultures in the identification of pathogenic microorganisms in BSI upon final clinical diagnosis. Among the different sample types, white blood cell samples had a lower clinical compliance rate compared to plasma samples, possibly due to the higher host rate in cell samples, which impairs the sensitivity of pathogen detection.

Indexed as

High-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingSepsisAdultAgedBacteriaBlood CultureFemaleFungiHumansLeukocytesMaleMiddle AgedBlood cultureBloodstream infectionsClinicalHybrid capture-based next generation sequencingMetagenomic next generation sequencing (mNGS)

Identifiers

PMID39529632
PMCPMC11552491

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.