ArticlePeerJ2024
Simple, reference-independent assessment to empirically guide correction and polishing of hybrid microbial community metagenomic assembly.
Article in PeerJ, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Copper availability controls niche differentiation between comammoxISME communications · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Hybrid metagenomic assembly of microbial communities, leveraging both long- and short-read sequencing technologies, is becoming an increasingly accessible approach, yet its widespread application faces several challenges. High-quality references may not be available for assembly accuracy comparisons common for benchmarking, and certain aspects of hybrid assembly may benefit from dataset-dependent, empiric guidance rather than the application of a uniform approach. In this study, several simple, reference-free characteristics-particularly coding gene content and read recruitment profiles-were hypothesized to be reliable indicators of assembly quality improvement during iterative error-fixing processes. These characteristics were compared to reference-dependent genome- and gene-centric analyses common for microbial community metagenomic studies. Two laboratory-scale bioreactors were sequenced with short- and long-read platforms, and assembled with commonly used software packages. Following long read assembly, long read correction and short read polishing were iterated up to ten times to resolve errors. These iterative processes were shown to have a substantial effect on gene- and genome-centric community compositions. Simple, reference-free assembly characteristics, specifically changes in gene fragmentation and short read recruitment, were robustly correlated with advanced analyses common in published comparative studies, and therefore are suitable proxies for hybrid metagenome assembly quality to simplify the identification of the optimal number of correction and polishing iterations. As hybrid metagenomic sequencing approaches will likely remain relevant due to the low added cost of short-read sequencing for differential coverage binning or the ability to access lower abundance community members, it is imperative that users are equipped to estimate assembly quality prior to downstream analyses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.