Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39529595›Full record

ArticlePhysiological reports2024

In silico analysis of ventricular action potential with a current-voltage-time representation: Thresholds, membrane resistance, repolarization reserve.

Massimiliano Zaniboni

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Physiological reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. The electrophysiology of ventricular cell pairs.Pflugers Archiv : European journal of physiology · 2025
    Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Massimiliano ZaniboniDepartment of Chemistry, Life Sciences and Environmental Sustainability, University of Parma (Italy) - Parco Area Delle Scienze, Parma, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-8808-2239

Funding

Local funding of the University of Parma FIL 2023 UNIPR
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The waveform of ventricular action potential (AP) is a key determinant of the cardiac cycle, a marker of beating pathophysiology, and a target for anti-arrhythmic drug design. The information contained in the waveform, though, is limited to the actual dynamics of the AP under consideration. By measuring quasi-instantaneous current-voltage relationships during repolarization, I propose a three-dimensional representation of the ventricular AP which includes potential dynamic responses that the beat can show when electrically perturbed. This representation is described in the case of a numerically reconstructed ventricular AP, but it can be, at least partially, derived in real cardiomyocytes. Simulation allows to disclose the potentialities and the limitations of the approach, that can be extended to any non-cardiac AP. By reporting, at any AP time, the ion current available within the physiological membrane potential range at that time, the representation makes all together available: (1) refractory period, (2) thresholds for eliciting full or calcium-driven APs, (3) threshold for all-or-none repolarization, (4) membrane resistance during repolarization, (5) the safety of membrane repolarization. It provides further evidence of a negative membrane resistance during the late phase of ventricular AP and a quantitative estimate of repolarization reserve (RR), key determinants of repolarization dynamics.

Indexed as

Action PotentialsComputer SimulationHeart VentriclesModels, CardiovascularAnimalsHumansMyocytes, CardiacVentricular Functioncardiac action potentialmembrane resistance during the action potentialquasi‐instantaneous IV curvesreserve of repolarizationthreshold for all‐or‐none‐repolarizationthreshold for excitationventricular repolarization

Identifiers

PMID39529595
PMCPMC11555294

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.