Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39529526›Full record

ArticleJournal of the National Cancer Institute. Monographs2024

Community intervention of a single-dose or 2-dose regimen of bivalent human papillomavirus vaccine in schoolgirls in Thailand: vaccine effectiveness 2 years and 4 years after vaccination.

Suchada Jiamsiri, Chulwoo Rhee, Hyeon Seon Ahn, Hyeong-Won Seo, Worrawan Klinsupa, Sunju Park, Jinae Lee, Nakorn Premsri, Chawetsan Namwat, Patummal Silaporn and 13 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the National Cancer Institute. Monographs, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors.

Suchada JiamsiriDepartment of Disease Control, Ministry of Public Health, Nonthaburi, Thailand.
Chulwoo RheeInternational Vaccine Institute, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-6868-7302
Hyeon Seon AhnInternational Vaccine Institute, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Hyeong-Won SeoInternational Vaccine Institute, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Worrawan KlinsupaDepartment of Disease Control, Ministry of Public Health, Nonthaburi, Thailand.
Sunju ParkInternational Vaccine Institute, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Jinae LeeInternational Vaccine Institute, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Nakorn PremsriNational Vaccine Institute, Nonthaburi, Thailand.
Chawetsan NamwatDepartment of Disease Control, Ministry of Public Health, Nonthaburi, Thailand.
Patummal SilapornDepartment of Disease Control, Ministry of Public Health, Nonthaburi, Thailand.
Jean-Louis ExclerInternational Vaccine Institute, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-6462-5101
Deok-Ryun KimInternational Vaccine Institute, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Yun ChonInternational Vaccine Institute, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Joshua N SampsonNational Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, MD, USA.
Pornjarim NilyanimitCenter of Excellence in Clinical Virology, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Sompong VongpunsawadCenter of Excellence in Clinical Virology, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Nimesh PoudyalInternational Vaccine Institute, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Lauri E MarkowitzCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Gitika PanickerCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Elizabeth R UngerCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Supachai Rerks-NgarmDepartment of Disease Control, Ministry of Public Health, Nonthaburi, Thailand.
Yong PoovorawanCenter of Excellence in Clinical Virology, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Julia LynchInternational Vaccine Institute, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

Funding

Gates Foundation OPP1188728
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWith accumulating evidence of single-dose human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine efficacy in young women, we conducted a community vaccine effectiveness study comparing HPV single-dose and 2-dose regimens (0 and 6 months) of a bivalent HPV vaccine among grade 8 schoolgirls (aged 13-14 years) in Thailand.

methodsIn 2018, eligible grade 8 schoolgirls in Udon Thani (single dose) and Buri Ram (2 doses) provinces were offered HPV vaccine per assigned dose regimen. Concurrently, a cross-sectional survey for measuring baseline HPV prevalence was conducted in grade 10 (n = 2600) and grade 12 unvaccinated schoolgirls (n = 2000) in each province. HPV infection was assessed in first-void urine samples, tested by DNA polymerase chain reaction on the cobas 4800 system (Roche Molecular Diagnostics, Pleasanton, CA). All samples positive on the cobas system and an equal number of negative samples were also tested by Anyplex II HPV28 Detection (Seegene, Seoul, South Korea). The surveys were repeated in 2020 and 2022, when vaccinated grade 8 schoolgirls reached grade 10, and then subsequently grade 12, respectively. Vaccine effectiveness was estimated by comparing the weighted prevalence of HPV-16 or HPV-18 between grade-matched unvaccinated schoolgirls on the baseline survey (2018) and vaccinated schoolgirls in the year-2 (2020) and year-4 (2022) surveys. Adjustment methods were used in the analysis to account for potential differences in sexual behavior due to the noncontemporaneous comparison.

resultsThe prevalence of HPV-16 and HPV-18 on the baseline survey among unvaccinated grade 10/grade 12 schoolgirls was 2.90% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 2.54% to 3.31%)/3.98% (95% CI = 3.52% to 4.49%) for Udon Thani and 3.87% (95% CI = 3.46% to 4.34%)/6.13% (95% CI = 5.56% to 6.75%) for Buri Ram. On the year-2 survey, the prevalence among vaccinated grade 10 schoolgirls was 0.57% (95% CI = 0.42% to 0.77%) for Udon Thani and 0.31% (95% CI = 0.21% to 0.47%) for Buri Ram. The 2-year postvaccination crude vaccine effectiveness for the single-dose regimen was estimated at 80.4% (95% CI = 73.9% to 86.9%), and for the 2-dose regimen at 91.9% (95% CI = 88.5% to 95.4%). On the year-4 survey, the prevalence among vaccinated grade 12 schoolgirls was 0.37% (95% CI = 0.25% to 0.56%) for Udon Thani and 0.28% (95% CI = 0.18% to 0.45%) for Buri Ram. Four-year postvaccination crude vaccine effectiveness for the single-dose regimen was estimated at 90.6% (95% CI = 86.6% to 94.6%) and for the 2-dose regimen was estimated at 95.4% (95% CI = 93.2% to 97.6%). All adjustment methods minimally affected vaccine effectiveness for the single-dose and 2-dose regimens. At 4 years after vaccination, the difference in crude vaccine effectiveness between the single-dose and 2-dose regimens was ‒4.79% (95% CI = ‒9.32% to ‒0.25%), meeting the study's noninferiority criteria.

conclusionsOur study demonstrated that both single-dose and 2-dose HPV vaccination significantly decreased HPV-16/18 point prevalence 2 years and 4 years after vaccination. Crude vaccine effectiveness at 4 years after vaccination was greater than 90% for both the single-dose and 2-dose regimens; the single-dose regimen was not inferior to the 2-dose regimen. These data show that a single dose of HPV vaccine provides high levels of protection when administered to schoolgirls younger than 15 years of age.

Indexed as

Papillomavirus InfectionsPapillomavirus VaccinesAdolescentCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansPrevalenceThailandVaccinationVaccine EfficacyPapillomavirus Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID39529526
PMCPMC11555278

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.