Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39529461›Full record

ArticleJournal of personality2025

Personality and Meat Consumption Among Romantic Partners in Daily Life.

Nicholas Poh-Jie Tan, Maxim Trenkenschuh, Dana Ackermann, Leyla Anina Rosero Betancourt, Wiebke Bleidorn, Christopher J Hopwood

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of personality, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Nicholas Poh-Jie TanDepartment of Psychology, The University of Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland.
Maxim TrenkenschuhDepartment of Psychology, The University of Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland.
Dana AckermannDepartment of Psychology, The University of Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland.
Leyla Anina Rosero BetancourtDepartment of Psychology, The University of Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland.
Wiebke BleidornDepartment of Psychology, The University of Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland.
Christopher J HopwoodDepartment of Psychology, The University of Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland.

Funding

Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung 10001G_220036
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveEating is often a social activity that can be influenced by others, particularly in close relationships when dietary preferences reflect underlying value differences. We sought to examine the personality traits of meat-eating couples who differ in their preferences for meat.

methodWe recruited Swiss romantic couples in which one partner typically consumed more meat than the other (N = 272, couples = 136). At baseline, participants completed survey measures of self- and informant-rated personality traits at the domain (e.g., agreeableness) and aspect level (e.g., compassion) and meat consumption. Participants then completed 28 daily meal surveys about their meat consumption.

resultsAmong high-meat eating partners, those higher in openness/intellect and compassion ate less meat. Additionally, higher intellect among low-meat eating partners predicted lower meat consumption among high-meat eating partners.

conclusionsThese findings replicate evidence that personality plays an important role in meat-eating and extend this evidence to meat consumption in a relational context.

Indexed as

Feeding BehaviorFood PreferencesInterpersonal RelationsMeatPersonalitySexual PartnersAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedYoung Adultdaily diarymeat consumptionpersonalityromantic relationships

Identifiers

PMID39529461
PMCPMC12421718

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.