ArticleJournal of inherited metabolic disease2025
Current global vitamin and cofactor prescribing practices for primary mitochondrial diseases: Results of a European reference network survey.
Article in Journal of inherited metabolic disease, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Consensus Guidelines for Diagnosis and Management of Pyruvate Dehydrogenase Complex Deficiency.Journal of inherited metabolic disease · 2026Review
- Review
- Advances in Primary Mitochondrial Diseases: Diagnosis, Natural History Studies and Clinical Trials.Genes · 2026Review
- Therapies for Mitochondrial Disease: Past, Present, and Future.Journal of inherited metabolic disease · 2025Review
- Current global vitamin and cofactor prescribing practices for primary mitochondrial diseases: Results of a European reference network survey.Journal of inherited metabolic disease · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Primary mitochondrial diseases (PMD) account for a group of approximately 400 different genetic disorders with diverse clinical presentations and pathomechanisms. Although each individual disorder is rare, collectively they represent one of the largest groups in the field of inherited metabolic disorders. The complexity of PMD results in a continued lack of therapeutic options, necessitating a predominantly symptomatic treatment approach for affected patients. While a subset of diseases responds exceptionally well to treatment with specific vitamins or cofactors, for most PMD systematic reviews were not able to show significant benefit. This is in discrepancy to their continued frequent use among specialists. To gain further insight into the current clinical practice of vitamin and cofactor supplementation among clinicians treating children and adults affected by PMD, we conducted a worldwide cross-sectional questionnaire study exploring the choice of substances and the specific diseases where they are applied. To our knowledge, this is the first global study exploring this topic and featuring a high response rate from paediatricians. The vast majority (95%, 106/112) of responding specialists recommended the use of vitamins and cofactors, either in an agnostic approach irrespective of the specific PMD or directed to the treatment of specific diseases or phenotypes. Our study highlights significant regional and specialty-specific differences in supplementation practices. We provide some preliminary insights into specialist-based opinions regarding the use of vitamins and cofactors in PMD and highlight the need for more rigorous clinical and preclinical investigations and/or clear consensus statements.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.