ArticleBritish journal of haematology2025
Minimal residual disease detection for acute lymphoblastic leukaemia in peripheral blood-Are we there yet?
Article in British journal of haematology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- An Update on Flow Cytometry Analysis of Hematological Malignancies: Focus on Standardization.Cancers · 2025Review
- Minimal residual disease detection for acute lymphoblastic leukaemia in peripheral blood-Are we there yet?British journal of haematology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Can peripheral blood be used to detect residual disease in acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL) when we increase the sensitivity of the method used? Bendig et al. found that a larger amount of material and the use of next-generation sequencing (NGS) detects MRD in peripheral blood in up to half of patients with B-cell precursor ALL (BCP-ALL) where routine examination was negative. However, a negative result does not exclude the presence of residual disease and thus still limits the use of peripheral blood. Commentary on: Bendig et al. Next-generation sequencing and high DNA input identify previously missed measurable residual disease in peripheral blood of B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukaemia. Br J Haematol 2025; 206:353-356.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.