Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39529337›Full record

ArticleRomanian journal of morphology and embryology = Revue roumaine de morphologie et embryologie

Conservative management of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 2 and prediction of its progression - a retrospective study.

Alexandru Cărăuleanu, Raluca Anamaria Mogoş, Iustina Petra Solomon-Condriuc, Claudia Florida Costea, Andrei Ionuţ Cucu, Ştefana Raluca Bran, Adina Elena Tănase, Gabriel Valentin Tănase, Elena Andreea Pruteanu, Demetra Gabriela Socolov and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Romanian journal of morphology and embryology = Revue roumaine de morphologie et embryologie. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Alexandru CărăuleanuDiscipline of Ophthalmology, Department of Surgery II, Faculty of Medicine, Grigore T. Popa University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Iaşi, Romania; Department of Ophthalmology, Prof. Dr. Nicolae Oblu Emergency Clinical Hospital, Iaşi, Romania; costea10@yahoo.com; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Doctoral School, Grigore T. Popa University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Iaşi, Romania; iustina_condriuc@yahoo.com.
Raluca Anamaria Mogoş
Iustina Petra Solomon-Condriuc
Claudia Florida Costea
Andrei Ionuţ Cucu
Ştefana Raluca Bran
Adina Elena Tănase
Gabriel Valentin Tănase
Elena Andreea Pruteanu
Demetra Gabriela Socolov
Florin Dumitru Petrariu
Cătălin Mihai Buzdugă

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimCervical intraepithelial neoplasia 2 (CIN2) evolution is controversial, and some of them regress spontaneously in a two-year follow-up. The purpose of this work was to evaluate the percentage of CIN2 progression or persistence during a 24-month follow-up, using clinical predictors such as human papillomavirus (HPV) genotype and cytology results. PATIENTS, MATERIALS AND

methodsThis is a retrospective case-control study and included patients of reproductive age who had a new diagnosis of CIN2 who were monitored for lesion regression (Group 1, n=72 patients), and progression or persistence (Group 2, n=36 patients). A multinominal logistic regression was preferred to evaluate the impact that various categorical risk elements can lead to outcomes of persistence or progression of CIN2. We also performed a linear regression to assess the risk of CIN2 progression or persistence using the interaction between clinical predictors.

resultsA previous cervical cytology indicative of high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL) [relative risk ratio (RRR): 3.85, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.66-8.90] or atypical squamous cells, cannot exclude HSIL (ASC-H) can highly raise the probability of a CIN2 progression or persistence. The presence of HPV16 increased the risk of CIN2+ with 3.77 (95% CI: 0.78-5.00), the presence of HPV18 increased the probability of CIN2+ with 4.39 (95% CI: 1.35-14.33), and other high-risk HPV (HR-HPV) strains increased the probability of CIN2+ with 3.62. The highest risk issue was produced by the interaction between HSIL* HPV16, ASC-H* HPV16, and ASC-H* HPV18.

conclusionsWhen discussing follow-up for CIN2 lesions, it is important to offer careful consideration and monitoring of patients with a previous HSIL or ASC-H cytology, with or without HPV 16, 18 or other HR-HPV strains, as their presence significantly increased the risk of CIN2 progression and persistence.

Indexed as

Disease ProgressionUterine Cervical DysplasiaAdultCase-Control StudiesConservative TreatmentFemaleHumansMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesUterine Cervical NeoplasmsbiopsycervixcolposcopyHPVPap smear

Identifiers

PMID39529337
PMCPMC11657321

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.