Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39529331›Full record

ArticleMedical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research2024

Iliac Periosteal Bone Autografting vs Talus Non-Weight-Bearing Surgery in Hepple V Talus Osteochondral Injuries: Comparative Analysis of Perioperative Outcomes.

Liu Lin, Zengyue Zhu, Heda Liu, Yingli Li

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Outcomes of Periosteal-Iliac Bone Autografting with Platelet-Rich Plasma in Patients with Hepple V Talar Lesions: A Retrospective Study.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Liu LinDepartment of Foot and Ankle Surgery, Cangzhou Hospital of Integrated TCM-WM Hebei, Cangzhou, Hebei, China.
Zengyue ZhuHebei Key Laboratory of Integrated Traditional and Western Medicine in Osteoarthrosis Research, Cangzhou, Hebei, China.
Heda LiuDepartment of Foot and Ankle Surgery, Cangzhou Hospital of Integrated TCM-WM Hebei, Cangzhou, Hebei, China.
Yingli LiDepartment of Foot and Ankle Surgery, Cangzhou Hospital of Integrated TCM-WM Hebei, Cangzhou, Hebei, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND Hepple stage V osteochondral injuries of the talus include subchondral cyst formation, secondary degenerative change, and secondary osteoarthritis. This retrospective study aimed to compare perioperative outcomes from iliac periosteal bone autografting and talus non-weight-bearing surgery in 162 patients with Hepple V osteochondral injuries of the talus. MATERIAL AND METHODS According to the inclusion criteria, 162 eligible patients were selected for analysis and divided into an iliac periosteal bone autograft group (n=82) and a talus non-weight-bearing group (n=80) according to the surgical methods. General data and data on perioperative conditions, complications, intraoperative fluoroscopy times, preoperative and postoperative visual analog scale (VAS) for pain, ankle-hindfoot scoring system (AOFAS Ankle-Hindfoot Scale), and plantar flexion and extension range of motion were collected to assess ankle joint function and were compared between groups. RESULTS The comparison of perioperative results between the 2 groups showed that the incision length (P=0.000), operation time (P=0.000), and length of hospital stay (P=0.000) in the iliac periosteal bone autograft group were longer than those in the talus non-weight-bearing group. The intraoperative blood loss in the anterior group was greater than that in non-weight-bearing group (P=0.000). Regarding complications, there were more cases of donor site paresthesia (P=0.014) and postoperative pain aggravation in the iliac periosteal bone autograft group than in the non-weight-bearing group. CONCLUSIONS In patients with Hepple V osteochondral injury of the talus, the incision length, operation time, and length of hospital stay in the talus non-weight-bearing group were shorter, there was less intraoperative blood loss, and there were fewer postoperative complications. In the short term, bone transplantation in the talus non-weight-bearing group was more "minimally invasive" and the postoperative recovery was better than in the iliac periosteal bone allograft group.

Indexed as

Bone TransplantationIliumPeriosteumTalusWeight-BearingAdultAnkle JointFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRange of Motion, ArticularRetrospective StudiesTransplantation, AutologousTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID39529331
PMCPMC11568631

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.