Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39529199›Full record

ArticleTrials2024

The cerebral and cognitive changes after intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS) treatment for depression: study protocol for a randomized double-blind sham-controlled trial.

Marte C Ørbo, Sabine Høier, Torgil R Vangberg, Gabor Csifcsak, Ole K Grønli, Per M Aslaksen

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Trials, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06534684 (The Cerebral and Cognitive Changes After Intermittent Theta Burst Stimulation), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06534684 narecruitingnot on this map

The Cerebral and Cognitive Changes After Intermittent Theta Burst Stimulation (iTBS) Treatment for Depression A Randomised Double-blind Sham-controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity Hospital of North NorwayRan2024 to 2029Enrolled50ConditionsDepression, Unipolar, Depression ModerateArmsIntermittent Theta Burst Stimulation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Marte C ØrboDepartment of Psychology, Faculty of Health Sciences, UiT - the Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway. marte.c.orbo@uit.no.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2661-7098
Sabine HøierDepartment of Psychology, Faculty of Health Sciences, UiT - the Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway.
Torgil R VangbergDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, UiT - the Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway.
Gabor CsifcsakDepartment of Psychology, UiT - the Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway.
Ole K GrønliDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, UiT - the Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway.
Per M AslaksenDepartment of Psychology, Faculty of Health Sciences, UiT - the Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway.

Funding

Helse Nord RHF HNF 1671-23
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe therapeutic use of intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS) delivered to the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (LDLPFC) is a relatively new but promising treatment option for depression. There is a need for more knowledge on the mechanisms involved in its antidepressant effects.

methodsThis is a single-centre, prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial with two arms, iTBS and sham iTBS. Adult outpatients with unipolar major depressive disorder of at least moderate severity will undergo cognitive assessment with an N-back task (0-back and 2-back), functional and structural magnetic resonance imaging and assessment of depression severity before and after brain stimulation. Neuronavigated iTBS or sham stimulation will be targeted at the LDPFC once a day for 10 consecutive workdays. ITBS will be delivered with the parameters 120% of resting motor threshold, triplet 50 Hz bursts repeated at 5 Hz; 2 s on and 8 s off, 600 pulses per session with a total duration of 3 min 9 s. The severity of depression will be measured with the Montogomery Aasberg Depression Rating Scale and the Beck Depression Inventory - second edition. In the iTBS group relative to sham, we expect significant antidepressant effects and improved N-back performance, associated with increased integrity in white matter tracts functionally connected with the LDLPFC and emotion regulation areas within the rostral anterior cingulate cortices, alongside potential increases in cortical thickness in these regions. On functional imaging, we expect to observe increased brain activity in the LDPFC during the performance of the N-back condition with higher cognitive load (2-back) in the iTBS group relative to sham. DISCUSSION: iTBS is a promising, time-efficient, and considered a safe treatment option for depression according to existing evidence. This trial aims to assess the neurocognitive impact of a 2-week, once-daily iTBS compared to sham iTBS, targeting the LDLPFC in depressed adult outpatients. The study investigates the relationships between changes in cerebral measures and cognitive performance on an N-back task in relation to the antidepressant effect following iTBS. This trial delves into the neurocognitive mechanisms of iTBS in depression, potentially offering novel scientific insights into its treatment effects and mechanisms of action.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT06534684. Retrospectively registered on August 1st 2024.

Indexed as

CognitionMagnetic Resonance ImagingMajor Depressive DisorderRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTranscranial Magnetic StimulationAdultDorsolateral Prefrontal CortexDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesTheta RhythmTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeCognitionDepressionfMRIFreeSurferNeuroimagingTheta burstWhite matter

Identifiers

PMID39529199
PMCPMC11555895

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.