Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39529189›Full record

ArticleJournal of intensive care2024

The method to identify invasive mechanical ventilation with Japanese claim data.

Ayaka Sakamoto, Yoshiaki Inoue

Abstract readLetter
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of intensive care, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ayaka SakamotoDepartment of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, University of Tsukuba Hospital, 2-1-1 Amakubo, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, 305-8576, Japan. ayaka.furukawa@md.tsukuba.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6922-1280
Yoshiaki InoueDepartment of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, University of Tsukuba Hospital, 2-1-1 Amakubo, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, 305-8576, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dr. Ohbe et al. reported that only 40.4% of patients who underwent invasive mechanical ventilation were treated in intensive care units, with significant variations in intensive care unit admission rates observed between hospitals and regions using Japanese claims data. The issue of validation when using claim data has been reported in previous studies. The definition of invasive mechanical ventilation used by Dr. Ohbe et al. appears overly broad, encompassing non-invasive mechanical ventilations via nasal mask and manual ventilation. We discuss the limitation of their method in identifying invasive mechanical ventilation, which is critical for defining the study population.

Indexed as

Claim dataInvasive mechanical ventilationJapanProcedure code

Identifiers

PMID39529189
PMCPMC11555860

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.