Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39529188›Full record

ArticleInjury epidemiology2024

Impact of cable lock distribution on firearm securement after emergent mental health evaluation: a randomized controlled trial.

Bijan Ketabchi, Michael A Gittelman, Yin Zhang, Wendy J Pomerantz

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Injury epidemiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05568901 (Impact of Gun Lock Distribution on Firearm Securement After Emergent Mental Health Evaluation), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05568901 nacompletednot on this map

Impact of Gun Lock Distribution on Firearm Securement After Emergent Mental Health Evaluation: A Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorChildren's Hospital Medical Center, CincinnatiRan2021 to 2022Enrolled200ConditionsFirearm Injury, Pediatric Emergency Medicine, Suicide and Self-harm, Mental Health IssueArmsLethal means counseling, Provision of Cable-style gun locks
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Bijan KetabchiDivision of Emergency Medicine, Dept of Pediatrics, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Perelman School of Medicine at theUniversity of Pennsylvania, 3501 Civic Center Blvd Colket Translational Research Building, 3rd Floor, Philadelphia, PA, USA. ketabchib@chop.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3882-0130
Michael A GittelmanDivision of Emergency Medicine, Dept of Pediatrics, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
Yin ZhangDivision of Emergency Medicine, Dept of Pediatrics, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
Wendy J PomerantzDivision of Emergency Medicine, Dept of Pediatrics, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA.

Funding

Ohio Department of Health: Child Injury Action Group Ohio Department of Health: Child Injury Action GroupWhitney/Strong Foundation Whitney/Strong Foundation
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSuicide-related presentations to pediatric emergency departments (PED) have increased in recent years. PED providers have the opportunity to reduce suicide risk by counseling on restricting access to lethal means. Supplementing lethal means counseling (LMC) with safety device distribution is effective in improving home safety practices. Data on PED-based LMC in high-risk patient populations is limited. The objective of this study was to determine if caregivers of children presenting to PED for mental health evaluation were more likely to secure all household firearms if given cable-style gun locks in addition to LMC.

methodsIn this randomized controlled trial, caregivers completed a survey regarding storage practices of firearms and medication in the home. Participants were randomized to receive LMC (control) or LMC plus 2 cable-style gun locks (intervention). Follow-up survey was distributed 1 month after encounter. Primary outcome was proportion of households reporting all household firearms secured at follow-up. Secondary outcomes included: removal of lethal means from the home, purchase of additional safety devices, use of PED-provided locks (intervention only), and acceptability of PED-based LMC.

resultsTwo hundred participants were enrolled and randomized. Comparable portions of study groups completed follow-up surveys. Control and intervention arms had similar proportions of households reporting all firearms secured at baseline (89.9% vs. 82.2%, p = 0.209) and follow-up (97.1% vs. 98.5%, p = 0.96), respectively. Other safety behaviors such as removal of firearms (17.6% vs. 11.8%, p = 0.732), removal of medication (19.1% vs. 13.2%, p = 0.361), and purchase of additional safety devices (66.2% vs. 61.8%, p = 0.721) were also alike between the two groups. Both groups held favorable views of PED-based counseling. Within the intervention group, 70% reported use of provided locks. Preference for a different style of securement device was the most cited reason among those not using PED-provided locks.

conclusionsPED-based LMC is a favorably-viewed, effective tool for improving home safety practices in families of high-risk children. Provision of cable-style gun locks did not improve rate of firearm securement compared LMC alone-likely due to high baseline rates of firearm securement and preference for different style of lock among non-utilizers. CLINICAL

trial registrationID: NCT05568901 . CLINICALTRIALS: gov. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ . Retrospectively registered October 6, 2022. First participant enrollment: June 28, 2021.

Indexed as

EmergencyFirearmLethal meansMental healthSuicide prevention

Identifiers

PMID39529188
PMCPMC11555855

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.