ArticleJournal of cheminformatics2024
Comparative evaluation of methods for the prediction of protein-ligand binding sites.
Article in Journal of cheminformatics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
24 citing papers in PubMed.
- EmmaEmb: A quantitative framework for analyzing embedding spaces in molecular biology.Patterns (New York, N.Y.) · 2026Article
- Extraction, Phytochemical Profiling, and Computational Evaluation ofPharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Decoding the allosteric grammar of protein kinases: A dual-stream framework integrating protein language models and energy landscape frustration analysis.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2026Article
- Can Cavity Prediction Algorithms Help in Docking Experiments?Journal of computational chemistry · 2026Article
- PythiaStudio: a one-stop protein engineering platform powered by Pythia model suite.Nucleic acids research · 2026Article
- PockFlex: a web server for flexibility-aware binding site identification and prioritisation from structural ensembles.Nucleic acids research · 2026Article
- Integrated Framework for Probing Multimodal Protein Foundation Models with Structure-Functional Interpretability Analysis in Detection of Allosteric Binding Sites.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Astaxanthin and naringin synergistically promote proliferation and myogenic differentiation of piscine satellite cells via mTOR signaling.Food chemistry: X · 2026Article
- From Genome Inspection to Precision Agrochemicals: A Structure-Based Antivirulence Roadmap for Sustainable Crop Protection againstJournal of agricultural and food chemistry · 2026Review
- Predicting and Decoding Allosteric Binding Sites Using Protein Language Models and Structure-Based Machine Learning: An Energy Landscape-Guided Explainable AI Framework.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2026Article
- LiBRe: A Ligand-Aware Sequence-Based Binding Residue Prediction Model for Virtual Screening.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2026Article
- SwinSite: 3D Structure-Based Prediction of Protein-Ligand Binding Sites Using a Combined Vision Transformer and Convolution Model.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2026Article
- AF2BIND: predicting small-molecule binding sites using the pair representation of AlphaFold2.Nature methods · 2026Article
- Novel Homo-SELEX for selecting universal aptamer for cross-species kidney injury biomarker KIM-1 in muti-scenario situ imaging.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2026Article
- Binding Site Vectors Enable Mapping of Cytochrome P450 Functional Landscapes.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2026Article
- UniPocket: Unified Ligand and Cryptic Pocket Prediction from Protein Language Model Embeddings.ACM-BCB ... ... : the ... ACM Conference on Bioinformatics, Computational Biology and Biomedicine. ACM Conference on Bioinformatics, Computational Biology and Biomedicine · 2026Article
- Eigenvalue Ratios Reveal Shared Binding Pocket Shapes in RNA and Protein Structures.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2026Article
- The Human Omnibus of Targetable Pockets.Journal of cheminformatics · 2025Article
- Evaluation of Small-Molecule Binding Site Prediction Methods on Membrane-Embedded Protein Interfaces.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2025Article
- PrankWeb 4: a modular web server for protein-ligand binding site prediction and downstream analysis.Nucleic acids research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The accurate identification of protein-ligand binding sites is of critical importance in understanding and modulating protein function. Accordingly, ligand binding site prediction has remained a research focus for over three decades with over 50 methods developed and a change of paradigm from geometry-based to machine learning. In this work, we collate 13 ligand binding site predictors, spanning 30 years, focusing on the latest machine learning-based methods such as VN-EGNN, IF-SitePred, GrASP, PUResNet, and DeepPocket and compare them to the established P2Rank, PRANK and fpocket and earlier methods like PocketFinder, Ligsite and Surfnet. We benchmark the methods against the human subset of our new curated reference dataset, LIGYSIS. LIGYSIS is a comprehensive protein-ligand complex dataset comprising 30,000 proteins with bound ligands which aggregates biologically relevant unique protein-ligand interfaces across biological units of multiple structures from the same protein. LIGYSIS is an improvement for testing methods over earlier datasets like sc-PDB, PDBbind, binding MOAD, COACH420 and HOLO4K which either include 1:1 protein-ligand complexes or consider asymmetric units. Re-scoring of fpocket predictions by PRANK and DeepPocket display the highest recall (60%) whilst IF-SitePred presents the lowest recall (39%). We demonstrate the detrimental effect that redundant prediction of binding sites has on performance as well as the beneficial impact of stronger pocket scoring schemes, with improvements up to 14% in recall (IF-SitePred) and 30% in precision (Surfnet). Finally, we propose top-N+2 recall as the universal benchmark metric for ligand binding site prediction and urge authors to share not only the source code of their methods, but also of their benchmark.Scientific contributionsThis study conducts the largest benchmark of ligand binding site prediction methods to date, comparing 13 original methods and 15 variants using 10 informative metrics. The LIGYSIS dataset is introduced, which aggregates biologically relevant protein-ligand interfaces across multiple structures of the same protein. The study highlights the detrimental effect of redundant binding site prediction and demonstrates significant improvement in recall and precision through stronger scoring schemes. Finally, top-N+2 recall is proposed as a universal benchmark metric for ligand binding site prediction, with a recommendation for open-source sharing of both methods and benchmarks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.