Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39529171›Full record

ArticleBJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology2025

Evolution of Episiotomy Incidence and Obstetric Anal Sphincter Injury Over 10 Years: A Mixed-Methods Study.

Julie Cormier, Lola Mirouse, Janine Barbot, François Goffinet, Camille Le Ray

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Julie CormierPort-Royal Maternity, AP-HP, Hôpital Cochin, FHU PREMA, Paris, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8182-7266
Lola MirouseCentre for the Study of Social Movements (EHESS/CNRS UMR8044/Inserm U1276), Paris, France.
Janine BarbotCentre for the Study of Social Movements (EHESS/CNRS UMR8044/Inserm U1276), Paris, France.
François GoffinetPort-Royal Maternity, AP-HP, Hôpital Cochin, FHU PREMA, Paris, France.
Camille Le RayPort-Royal Maternity, AP-HP, Hôpital Cochin, FHU PREMA, Paris, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0891-1063

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo assess the association between the decrease in the use of episiotomy and the incidence of obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS) over a 10-year period and understand their reasons by interviewing obstetricians and midwives.

designMixed-methods study.

settingA tertiary university public maternity hospital, Paris, France. POPULATION: All patients who delivered vaginally between January 2012 and December 2021 in the maternity hospital and 20 interviews with obstetrician-gynaecologists and midwives.

methodsQuantitative data analysis using a multivariate logistic regression model, stratifying on the mode of delivery. Semi-structured interview with 20 obstetricians and midwives, with an interview guide.

main outcome measuresObstetric anal sphincter injuries.

resultsThe quantitative study of 37 942 women (16.1% of whom had an episiotomy and 1.4% OASIS) shows that, the incidence of episiotomy decreased from 25% to 7.6% over this 10-year period. Allow on the known risk factors for OASIS, we demonstrate that its incidence rose (adjusted odds ratio 1.35, 95% confidence interval 1.09-1.67) for the years in which the episiotomy incidence fell below 10% for the overall population. The interviews showed professionals' apparent awareness that the decreased incidence in episiotomy (achieved by changes in departmental policy, redefining its benefit/risk balance and acquiring new skills to manage the expulsion phase) could lead to an increased incidence of OASIS.

conclusionsDecreasing the episiotomy incidence appears to be associated with a rising incidence of OASIS. The optimal incidence of episiotomy remains controversial in the literature and among professionals.

Indexed as

Anal CanalDelivery, ObstetricEpisiotomyLacerationsObstetric Labor ComplicationsAdultFemaleHumansIncidenceLogistic ModelsObstetricsParisPregnancyRisk Factorsepisiotomymixed‐methodsOASISoperative vaginal deliveryspontaneous vaginal delivery

Identifiers

PMID39529171
PMCPMC11794053

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.