Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39529118›Full record

ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2024

Machine learning-based predictive model for post-stroke dementia.

Zemin Wei, Mengqi Li, Chenghui Zhang, Jinli Miao, Wenmin Wang, Hong Fan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. An explainable predictive machine learning model of oxaliplatin induced peripheral neuropathy based on clinical data: a retrospective single center.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Zemin WeiDepartment of Geriatrics, Shaoxing People's Hospital, Shaoxing, Zhejiang, P. R. China.
Mengqi LiSchool of Medicine, Shaoxing University, Shaoxing, Zhejiang, P. R. China.
Chenghui ZhangSchool of Medicine, Shaoxing University, Shaoxing, Zhejiang, P. R. China.
Jinli MiaoThe Yangtze River Delta Biological Medicine Research and Development Center of Zhejiang Province, Yangtze Delta Region Institution of Tsinghua University, Hangzhou, 314006, Zhejiang, P.R. China.
Wenmin WangThe Yangtze River Delta Biological Medicine Research and Development Center of Zhejiang Province, Yangtze Delta Region Institution of Tsinghua University, Hangzhou, 314006, Zhejiang, P.R. China.
Hong FanDepartment of Geriatrics, Shaoxing People's Hospital, Shaoxing, Zhejiang, P. R. China. fanhongsx@126.com.

Funding

Health Science and Technology Program of Zhejiang Province 2022KY1285Shaoxing Health Science and Technology Plan Project 2023SKY029Traditional Chinese Medicine Scientific Research Fund Project of Zhejiang Province 2020ZB270Zhejiang Province Public Welfare Technology Application Research Project LGF20H170005
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPost-stroke dementia (PSD), a common complication, diminishes rehabilitation efficacy and affects disease prognosis in stroke patients. Many factors may be related to PSD, including demographic, comorbidities, and examination characteristics. However, most existing methods are qualitative evaluations of independent factors, which ignore the interaction amongst various factors. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to explore the applicability of machine learning (ML) methods for predicting PSD.

methods9 acceptable features were screened out by the Spearman correlation analysis and Boruta algorithm. We developed and evaluated 8 ML models: logistic regression, elastic net, k-nearest neighbors, decision tree, extreme gradient boosting, support vector machine, random forest, and multilayer perceptron.

resultsA total of 539 stroke patients were included in this study. Among the 8 models used to predict PSD, extreme gradient boosting and random forest showed the highest area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC), with values of 0.7287 and 0.7285, respectively. The most important features for predicting PSD included age, high sensitivity C-reactive protein, stroke side and location, and the occurrence of cerebral hemorrhage.

conclusionOur findings suggest that ML models, especially extreme gradient boosting, can best predict the risk of PSD.

Indexed as

DementiaMachine LearningStrokeAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedBoruta algorithmMachine learningPost-stroke dementiaPrediction modelStroke

Identifiers

PMID39529118
PMCPMC11555950

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.