SynthesisBMC women's health2024
Female genital cosmetic procedures from the perspective of health practitioners: a systematic review of knowledge, attitude and practice studies.
Synthesis in BMC women's health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Influencing Factors and Satisfaction with Body and Genital Image in Women Undergoing Genital Cosmetic Surgery: A Randomized, Cross-Sectional Study.Aesthetic plastic surgery · 2026Trial
- Pelvic Examination in Undergraduate Medical Education: A Scoping Review.The clinical teacher · 2026Article
- Clinical Observations of the Modified Wedge Resection in Composite Labia Minora and Clitoral Hood Reduction Surgery.Aesthetic plastic surgery · 2026Article
- Perception of aesthetic procedures applied to the vulva in the context of the medical specialty of gynecology and obstetrics.Sexual medicine · 2026Article
- Female Genital Cosmetic Surgery in Saudi Arabia: A Systematic Review of Awareness, Attitudes, Satisfaction, and Clinical Outcomes.Aesthetic surgery journal. Open forum · 2026Review
- The Effect of Technique Selection in Labiaplasty Surgery: Analysis of Aesthetic and Functional Outcomes.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Knowledge of Vaginal Microbiota and Its Association with Perceptions of Vulvovaginal Aesthetic Procedures Among Saudi Women.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCurrently, the popularity of female genital cosmetic procedures is on the rise worldwide. Despite the multiple roles of healthcare practitioners at different stages of women's decision-making for these procedures, limited studies have been conducted in this area. This systematic review aimed to summarize the available qualitative and quantitative data from observational studies that investigated healthcare practitioners' knowledge, attitudes and practices regarding female genital cosmetic procedures.
methodThe present systematic review was performed based on PRISMA guidelines. All published studies that examined the knowledge, attitudes and practices of healthcare practitioners regarding female genital cosmetic procedures were included. PubMed/Medline, Scopus, Web-of-science, ScienceDirect and Google Scholar were searched using related keywords until 30 November 2023. Quality assessment was performed using the Appraisal Tool for Cross-Sectional Studies and Checklist for Qualitative Research from the Joanna Briggs Institute.
resultsEight studies comprising 2063 healthcare practitioners met the inclusion criteria and were analysed. Based on the results, some healthcare practitioners in the included studies acknowledged the naturalness of the variety of female genitalia, but others considered very small labia as attractive. There was little agreement on the positive effects of female genital cosmetic procedures on improving women's quality of life and sexual function in the included studies. Nearly all healthcare practitioners have seen women who had concerns about being natural of their genitalia. Meanwhile, approximately two-thirds of them had encountered women requesting female genital cosmetic procedures. Only three-quarters of healthcare practitioners felt confident in assessing the normality of genital appearance. The willingness to perform female genital cosmetic procedures was higher among male healthcare practitioners and plastic surgeons than among females and gynecologists.
conclusionThe results indicated that although a large number of healthcare practitioners had encountered women who were concerned about genitalia or requested genital cosmetic procedures, they did not have sufficient knowledge or favorable attitudes and practices in most related fields. Therefore, it is recommended to design educational interventions, formulate guidelines and make policies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.