Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39529017›Full record

ArticleBMC urology2024

Comparative study in distal hypospadias repair: a meatal-based flaps technic vs. tubularized incised plate urethroplasty.

Sinan Kılıç, Mehmet Kaba, İlhan Gecit

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC urology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sinan KılıçDepartment of Pediatric Surgery, Gebze Yuzyil Hospital, Gebze, Kocaeli, Turkey. dr.sinankilic@yahoo.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3454-5538
Mehmet KabaDepartment of Urology, Gebze Yuzyil Hospital, Gebze, Kocaeli, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8351-9016
İlhan GecitDepartment of Urology, Van Yuzuncu Yil University, Van, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7329-6971

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesHypospadias is the most common anomaly of the male genital system after undescended testis. More than 200 surgical repair techniques have been described for the treatment of hypospadias due to many different meatus localisations and other accompanying anomalies. Kutlay defined a new technique in 2010 with 10 patients with distal hypospadias patients. We compared this new technique with tubularized incised plate urethroplasty (TIP) which is one of the most frequently performed methods.

methods148 patients with hypospadias who underwent surgery at the Urology and Pediatric Surgery Clinic during the period of January 2010 to December 2022 in the first and 2nd clinic, were retrospectively analyzed. The study focused on the remaining 83 patients with distal hypospadias for the purpose of comparison.

resultsThe mean age of group one was 10.0 (± 6.9, range 2-27), while for group two it was 10.8 (± 5.9, range 3-23). There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in terms of anatomical position of the meatus, stricture and fistula complications (p > 0.5).

conclusionThe Kutlay technique has been described as an easy-to-learn and feasible method with reliable results. No significant difference in complications was observed in this study compared with TIP, which is known as the standard technique worldwide. We would like to suggest that the method be considered for further evaluation with larger patient groups and different techniques.

Indexed as

HypospadiasSurgical FlapsUrethraUrologic Surgical Procedures, MaleAdolescentAdultChildChild, PreschoolHumansMaleRetrospective StudiesYoung AdultFistulaHypospadiasKutlay techniqueMeatal-based flapSnodgrass

Identifiers

PMID39529017
PMCPMC11552379

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.