Trial reportBMC psychiatry2024
Engagement in a virtual group-based walking intervention for persons with schizophrenia: a qualitative study.
Trial report in BMC psychiatry, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundExercise is beneficial for persons with schizophrenia; however, high dropout rates limit the impact of interventions. Virtual exercise programs have the potential to improve engagement; however, few intervention studies of virtual programs have been conducted in this population.
methodsThis study examined qualitative data from 15 adults with schizophrenia who participated in a pilot randomized controlled trial of Virtual PACE-Life, a live, video-delivered group walking intervention guided by self-determination theory. Interviews elicited feedback on the intervention, barriers and facilitators to engagement, recommendations for intervention refinement, and preferences for exercise programming modality. Rapid qualitative analysis was used to explore similarities and differences between completers (i.e., those that attended ≥ 50% of virtual walking sessions; n = 9) and non-completers (i.e., those that attended < 50% of virtual walking sessions; n = 6).
resultsBoth groups viewed Virtual PACE-Life positively but found the virtual exercise sessions challenging and inadequate for facilitating social interaction. Work obligations impacted completers' attendance whereas technological issues and forgetting impacted non-completers' attendance at virtual walking sessions. Completers preferred virtual exercise programs and non-completers preferred in-person exercise programs.
conclusionsThese findings suggest that future virtual group-based walking programs should prioritize enhancing the social aspect, offering scheduling choices, and regularly assessing the perceived difficulty of exercise sessions. These modifications not only have the potential to improve intervention engagement but they also may increase participant autonomy and relatedness, core components of self-determination theory.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.