ArticleBMC cancer2024
MET amplification correlates with poor prognosis and immunotherapy response as a subtype of melanoma: a multicenter retrospective study.
Article in BMC cancer, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Elevated ferroptosis is associated with elevated T cells in patients with heat stroke.Molecular biology reports · 2026Article
- Review
- Real-world safety of Tepotinib: Insights from the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System.PloS one · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMesenchymal epithelial transition factor (MET) variant is an independent prognostic factor for worse prognosis in patients with lung cancer or gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma. MET gene variants can be regarded as a subtype of melanoma but there is a lack of studies regarding the frequency of MET genetic alterations and the efficacy of immunotherapy in melanoma patients. The purpose of this study is to explore potential therapeutic strategies for melanoma subtypes with MET alterations.
methodsA total of 1751 malignant melanomas were analyzed to illustrate the landscape of MET mutations. We collected 55 melanoma cases from multicenter for a retrospective cohort from 2010 to 2023. We analyzed the impact of MET amplification on the efficacy of immunotherapy in the retrospective cohort after propensity score matching (PSM) and a pancancer cohort. CIBERSORT was used to evaluate the immune infiltration.
resultsThere were no instances of MET 14 exon skipping, and only instances of MET amplification were found in the 1751 melanomas and our retrospective cohort. Cox proportional hazards model analysis showed that MET amplification (P = 0.006) was significantly associated with poorer overall survival (OS) in patients who received immunotherapy as the first-line treatment. Compared with patients with MET amplification, patients in the negative control (NC) group had a significantly better OS (P = 0.022) after PSM. Analysis of 1661 pancancer cases with the MSK-IMPACT assay showed that patients receiving immunotherapy in the MET amplification group had a trend toward worse OS than those without MET amplification (P = 0.025).
conclusionsThis database analysis showed that the main type of MET mutation is amplification in malignant melanoma. MET-amplified solid tumors might be considered for targeted therapy, as MET amplification can be regarded as a risk factor affecting the prognosis of patients with tumors treated with immunotherapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.