Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39528969›Full record

ArticleThe journal of headache and pain2024

Attentional network deficits in patients with migraine: behavioral and electrophysiological evidence.

Yuxin Chen, Siyuan Xie, Libo Zhang, Desheng Li, Hui Su, Rongfei Wang, Ran Ao, Xiaoxue Lin, Yingyuan Liu, Shuhua Zhang and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of headache and pain, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Yuxin Chen *CAS Key Laboratory of Mental Health, Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100101, China.
Siyuan Xie *Department of Neurology, The First Medical Centre, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, 100853, China.
Libo ZhangCAS Key Laboratory of Mental Health, Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100101, China.
Desheng LiDepartment of Neurology, The First Medical Centre, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, 100853, China.
Hui SuDepartment of Neurology, The First Medical Centre, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, 100853, China.
Rongfei WangDepartment of Neurology, The First Medical Centre, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, 100853, China.
Ran AoDepartment of Neurology, The First Medical Centre, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, 100853, China.
Xiaoxue LinDepartment of Neurology, The First Medical Centre, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, 100853, China.
Yingyuan LiuDepartment of Neurology, The First Medical Centre, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, 100853, China.
Shuhua ZhangDepartment of Neurology, The First Medical Centre, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, 100853, China.
Deqi ZhaiDepartment of Neurology, The First Medical Centre, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, 100853, China.
Yin SunDepartment of Neurology, The First Medical Centre, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, 100853, China.
Shuqing WangDepartment of Neurology, The First Medical Centre, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, 100853, China.
Li HuCAS Key Laboratory of Mental Health, Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100101, China.
Zhao DongDepartment of Neurology, The First Medical Centre, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, 100853, China. dong_zhaozhao@126.com.
Xuejing LuCAS Key Laboratory of Mental Health, Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100101, China. luxj@psych.ac.cn.

Funding

Beijing Natural Science Foundation JQ22018National Key Research and Development Program of China 2023YFC2508702National Natural Science Foundation of China 32071061National Natural Science Foundation of China 32171077National Natural Science Foundation of China 82171208
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatients with migraine often experience not only headache pain but also cognitive dysfunction, particularly in attention, which is frequently overlooked in both diagnosis and treatment. The influence of these attentional deficits on the pain-related clinical characteristics of migraine remains poorly understood, and clarifying this relationship could improve care strategies.

methodsThis study included 52 patients with migraine and 34 healthy controls. We employed the Attentional Network Test for Interactions and Vigilance-Executive and Arousal Components paradigm, combined with electroencephalography, to assess attentional deficits in patients with migraine, with an emphasis on phasic alerting, orienting, executive control, executive vigilance, and arousal vigilance. An extreme gradient boosting binary classifier was trained on features showing group differences to distinguish patients with migraine from healthy controls. Moreover, an extreme gradient boosting regression model was developed to predict clinical characteristics of patients with migraine using their attentional deficit features.

resultsFor general performance, patients with migraine presented a larger inverse efficiency score, a higher prestimulus beta-band power spectral density and a lower gamma-band event-related synchronization at Cz electrode, and stronger high alpha-band activity at the primary visual cortex, compared to healthy controls. Although no behavior differences in three basic attentional networks were found, patients showed magnified N1 amplitude and prolonged latency of P2 for phasic alerting-trials as well as an increased orienting evoked-P1 amplitude. For vigilance function, improvements in the hit rate of executive vigilance-trials were exhibited in controls but not in patients. Besides, patients with migraine exhibited longer reaction time as well as larger variability in arousal vigilance-trials than controls. The binary classifier developed by such attentional deficit features achieved an F1 score of 0.762 and an accuracy of 0.779 in distinguishing patients with migraine from healthy controls. Crucially, the predicted value available from the regression model involving attentional deficit features significantly correlated with the real value for the frequency of headache.

conclusionsPatients with migraine demonstrated significant attentional deficits, which can be used to differentiate migraine patients from healthy populations and to predict clinical characteristics. These findings highlight the need to address cognitive dysfunction, particularly attentional deficits, in the clinical management of migraine.

Indexed as

AttentionElectroencephalographyExecutive FunctionMigraine DisordersAdultArousalFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedYoung AdultAttentionElectroencephalography (EEG)HypersensitivityMachine learningMigraineVigilance

Identifiers

PMID39528969
PMCPMC11552239

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.