ArticleBMC gastroenterology2024
Endoscopic resection for esophageal granular cell tumors: report of 62 cases.
Article in BMC gastroenterology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundTo analyze the clinical manifestations, endoscopic features, pathological features, endoscopic resection, and prognosis of esophageal granular cell tumors (GCTs).
methodsThe present study retrospectively analyzed and followed up the clinical data of 62 patients diagnosed with esophageal GCTs who underwent endoscopic resection at Zhongshan Hospital of Fudan University between July 2007 and March 2022. The clinicopathological features, endoscopic diagnosis, and treatment experience of esophageal GCT patients were summarized.
resultsAmong the 62 patients with esophageal GCT, there were 34 males and 28 females, with an average age of 49.3 ± 11.7 years. Only 11 patients had symptoms, such as epigastric discomfort, regurgitation or dysphagia. One patient had multiple lesions, and the rest had single lesions, totaling 63 lesions. Most lesions (53/63) were located in the median and lower esophagus, the diameters ranged from 3 to 22 mm. The endoscopic morphology of the GCTs was molar, flat, hemispherical, or irregular submucosal protuberance. Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) was performed in 38 cases, most cases (31/38) were hypoechoic, and 32 cases were appeared as homogeneous lesions. There were no complications during or after the endoscopic operations, and the en bloc resection rate was 100%. The negative rate of microscopic incisional margin was 63.5% (40/63). No patients developed recurrence during the follow-up period. The follow-up duration was 21-197 months (100.5 months for average).
conclusionEsophageal GCT is a rare disease with no obvious symptoms and a good prognosis. Endoscopic resection is a safe and effective method of diagnosis and treatment for esophageal GCTs. A microscopic positive tumor margin may not increase the rate of recurrence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.