Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39528937›Full record

Trial reportBMC anesthesiology2024

Effect of intravenous lidocaine on catheter‑related bladder discomfort, postoperative pain and opioid requirement in complex fusion lumbar spinal surgery: a randomized, double blind, controlled trial.

Ekasak Chantrapannik, Sithapan Munjupong, Natirat Limprasert, Sarita Jinawong

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC anesthesiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Efficacy of Open-Ended Urinary Catheters in Preventing Catheter-Related Bladder Discomfort: A Randomized Controlled Trial.International journal of urology : official journal of the Japanese Urological Association · 2025
    Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ekasak ChantrapannikDepartment of Anesthesiology, Phramongkutklao Hospital and Phramongkutklao Collage of Medicine, Bangkok, 10400, Thailand.
Sithapan MunjupongDepartment of Anesthesiology, Phramongkutklao Hospital and Phramongkutklao Collage of Medicine, Bangkok, 10400, Thailand. Sithapan@gmail.com.
Natirat LimprasertDepartment of Anesthesiology, Phramongkutklao Hospital and Phramongkutklao Collage of Medicine, Bangkok, 10400, Thailand.
Sarita JinawongDepartment of Anesthesiology, Phramongkutklao Hospital and Phramongkutklao Collage of Medicine, Bangkok, 10400, Thailand.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCatheter-related bladder discomfort (CRBD) and pain commonly arises postoperatively in patients who undergo intra-operative urinary catheterization. The study aims to demonstrate the effectiveness of intravenous lidocaine to prevent CRBD and postoperative pain in complex lumbar spinal surgery.

methodsEighty male patients, aged 20-79 years, scheduled for elective fusion spine surgery at least two levels were randomly assigned to receive either intravenous lidocaine (1.5 mg/kg followed by 2 mg/kg/h) (Group L) or a parallel volume of normal saline (Group C). The primary outcome was incidence of moderate to severe CRBD in a postanesthetic care unit (PACU) between the two groups. Secondary outcomes included postoperative pain, 24-hour post operative opioid requirement, mild and moderate to severe CRBD at 1, 2, 6 and 24 h postoperatively, patient satisfaction on Global Perceived Effect Scale (GPES), and the adverse effects of lidocaine and surgical complications.

resultsGroup L showed a significantly lower incidence of moderate-to-severe CRBD compared to Group C in the PACU (P = 0.002) and at 1 h postoperatively (P = 0.039). Additionally, Group L experienced a significantly lower average pain scores compared to Group C at all time points (P < 0.001, P < 0.001, P = 0.001, P < 0.001 and P < 0.001 at 0, 1, 2, 6 and 24 h, respectively) and demonstrated a significantly reduced postoperative morphine requirement across all time intervals (P < 0.05). Group L also reported significantly higher satisfaction on GPES compared to group C (P < 0.001). No adverse outcome was observed in either group.

conclusionIntravenous lidocaine administration significantly reduced the incidence of moderate-to-severe CRBD at PACU and at 1 h postoperatively. Additionally, its use in complex spine surgery led to reductions in postoperative pain, opioid requirement, and improved patient satisfaction, without any observed side effects.

Indexed as

Analgesics, OpioidAnesthetics, LocalLidocainePostoperative PainSpinal FusionAdultAgedDouble-Blind MethodHumansLumbar VertebraeMaleMiddle AgedPatient SatisfactionUrinary CatheterizationYoung AdultAnalgesics, OpioidAnesthetics, LocalLidocaineCatheter-related bladder discomfortLidocainePostoperative painSpine surgery

Identifiers

PMID39528937
PMCPMC11552165

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.