ArticleInternational journal of emergency medicine2024
Facial high-pressure injection injury with air in a child.
Article in International journal of emergency medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Hydraulic fracturing-induced delamination and extravasation extends medial damage beyond the false lumen in aortic dissection.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHigh-pressure injection injuries are rare injuries and are frequently underestimated due to the limited external damage. Because of their association with occupational activities, these injuries are predominantly seen in hands. Facial involvement in such traumas is extremely rare. The difference in facial anatomy compared to the extremities demands careful consideration of both associated complications and treatment options. CASE: A 6-year-old girl with no significant medical history was presented to the Emergency Department with a high-pressure injection injury to her right eye with a high-pressure cleaner. This resulted in injection of air at a pressure of 8 bar into the eye. She developed significant subcutaneous emphysema in the facial and neck regions. Additionally, intraorbital and intracranial emphysema were identified without any fractures. Treatment consisted of inpatient observation and antibiotic treatment. The patient was discharged after one day of observation for continued antibiotic treatment at home. Two weeks later, the patient had no residual symptoms and there were no signs of secondary infection.
conclusionHigh-pressure injection injuries to the face are rare and demand a different approach compared to the most common high-pressure injection injuries to the extremities. The nature of the injected material is paramount in choosing the appropriate treatment. This case illustrates that a high-pressure injection injury with air in the facial region, leading to extensive emphysema, can be managed conservatively with antibiotic therapy and inpatient observation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.