Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39528882›Full record

SynthesisJournal of imaging informatics in medicine2025

Radiomics-Based Diagnosis in Dentomaxillofacial Radiology: A Systematic Review.

Özge Dönmez Tarakçı, Hatice Cansu Kış, Hakan Amasya, İrem Öztürk, Emre Karahan, Kaan Orhan

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of imaging informatics in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Dental Pediatric Radiology: Toward a Comprehensive and Multidisciplinary Field.International journal of paediatric dentistry · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Özge Dönmez TarakçıDepartment of Dentomaxillofacial Radiology, Faculty of Dentistry, Izmir Tınaztepe University, Izmir, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2870-3256
Hatice Cansu KışDepartment of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Tokat Gaziosmanpaşa University, Tokat, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4956-7537
Hakan AmasyaDepartment of Dentomaxillofacial Radiology, Faculty of Dentistry, Istanbul University-Cerrahpaşa, Istanbul, Turkey. h-amasya@hotmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7400-9938
İrem ÖztürkDepartment of Dentomaxillofacial Radiology, Faculty of Dentistry, Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6496-6977
Emre KarahanDepartment of Dentomaxillofacial Radiology, Faculty of Dentistry, Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2418-7458
Kaan OrhanDepartment of Dentomaxillofacial Radiology, Faculty of Dentistry, Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6768-0176

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Radiomics is a quantitative tool for digital image analysis. This systematic review aims to investigate the scientific articles to evaluate the potential implications of Radiomics analysis in Dentomaxillofacial Radiology (DMFR). Studies regarding Radiomics applications in DMFR and human samples, in vivo study, a case reports/series if ≧5 samples were included, while case reports/series if < 5 samples, articles other than in English, abstracts without full text, and studies published before 2015 were excluded. Fifty-one articles were selected from 3789 literatures. The QUADAS-2 tool was used for risk of bias assessment. The accuracy of predicting dentomaxillofacial pathologies was considered as the primary outcome, and the modeling type of Radiomics was considered as the secondary outcome. A meta-analysis could not be performed due to the lack of information and standardization among the reported accuracies. The reported accuracies were found between 0.66 and 99.65%. Logistic regression (n = 6) was found to be the most common Radiomics modeling type, followed by Support Vector Machine and Decision Tree (n = 5). Second-order statistics (n = 38) was the most common type of Radiomics application, followed by first-order (n = 26), higher-order (n = 20), and shape-based (n = 15) statistics. Further work is needed to increase standardization in the Radiomics workflow. Quantitative image analysis is an alternative tool for conventional visual radiographic evaluation. Radiomics systems depend on elements such as imaging modality, feature type, data mining, or statistical method. Radiomics applications do not justify digital transformation on their own, but the potential of its integration into the digital workflow is considerable.

Indexed as

Radiography, DentalHumansRadiomicsDiagnosisDigitalRadiologyRadiomics

Identifiers

PMID39528882
PMCPMC12344034

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.