ArticleCardiovascular engineering and technology2025
Insights from Computational Fluid Dynamics and In Vitro Studies for Stent Protrusion in Iliac Vein: How Far Shall We Go?
Article in Cardiovascular engineering and technology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Hematologic complications and design challenges in cardiovascular devices.Communications engineering · 2026Review
- Intravascular Ultrasound Findings in Acute and Chronic Deep Vein Thrombosis of the Lower Extremities.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Hemodynamic characteristics and clinical treatment of patients with iliac vein compression syndrome.Frontiers in surgery · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
These findings provide significant implications for the enhancement of iliac vein stent implantation strategies and stent design. The prevalent use of stents for treating Iliac Vein Compression Syndrome (IVCS) has shown efficacy, yet the associated clinical adverse events, including stent restenosis and postoperative thrombosis, are significant concerns. Up to now, the mechanism how the stent implantation induces the restenosis and DVT is still unclear. Our study hypothesizes that these adverse outcomes arise from altered blood flow dynamics following stent implantation. Employing computational modeling and medical imaging, we simulated IVCS after various stenting procedures to assess their impact on venous blood flow characteristics, including wall shear stress (WSS), residence time (RRT), and oscillatory shear index (OSI). Our findings reveal that a stent protruding into the vena cava impedes blood circulation, with increased protrusion exacerbating this obstruction. This is particularly evident at the vein bifurcation, where low WSS and elevated OSI and RRT are observed. Moreover, a higher stent strut density further obstructs blood flow, deteriorating the hemodynamic environment. Consequently, stent protrusion into the vena cava can enhance the likelihood of adverse post-surgical events. These insights have profound implications for optimizing iliac vein stent implantation techniques and stent design.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39528864What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.